𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Reconstruction of undersampled dynamic images by modeling the motion of object elements

✍ Scribed by Claudia Prieto; Philip G. Batchelor; D.L.G. Hill; Joseph V. Hajnal; Marcelo Guarini; Pablo Irarrazaval


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2007
Tongue
English
Weight
958 KB
Volume
57
Category
Article
ISSN
0740-3194

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Abstract

Dynamic MRI is restricted due to the time required to obtain enough data to reconstruct the image sequence. Several undersampled reconstruction techniques have been proposed to reduce the acquisition time. In most of these techniques the nonacquired data are recovered by modeling the temporal information as varying pixel intensities represented in time or in temporal frequencies. Here we propose a new approach that recovers the missing data through a motion estimation of the __ob__ject __el__ements (“obels,” or pieces of tissue) of the image. This method assumes that an obel displacement through the sequence has lower bandwidth than fluctuations in pixel intensities caused by the motion, and thus it can be modeled with fewer parameters. Preliminary results show that this technique can effectively reconstruct (with root mean square (RMS) errors below 4%) cardiac images and joints with undersampling factors of 8 and 4, respectively. Moreover, in the reconstruction process an approximation of the motion vectors is obtained for each obel, which can be used to quantify dynamic information. In this method the motion need not be confined to a part of the field of view (FOV) or to a portion of the temporal frequency. It is appropriate for dynamic studies in which the obels' motion model has fewer parameters than the number of acquired samples. Magn Reson Med 57:939–949, 2007. © 2007 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.


📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES


Comparison of three physiologically-base
✍ Daniel P. Barboriak; James R. MacFall; Benjamin L. Viglianti; Mark W. Dewhirst D 📂 Article 📅 2008 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 676 KB

## Abstract ## Purpose To compare the performance of three physiologically‐based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models for predicting gadolinium contrast agent concentration‐time curves (Gd‐CTCs) obtained in superior sagittal sinus (SSS), cerebral cortex, and psoas muscle. ## Materials and Methods Three