Comparison of three physiologically-based pharmacokinetic models for the prediction of contrast agent distribution measured by dynamic MR imaging
✍ Scribed by Daniel P. Barboriak; James R. MacFall; Benjamin L. Viglianti; Mark W. Dewhirst DVM
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2008
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 676 KB
- Volume
- 27
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 1053-1807
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Abstract
Purpose
To compare the performance of three physiologically‐based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models for predicting gadolinium contrast agent concentration‐time curves (Gd‐CTCs) obtained in superior sagittal sinus (SSS), cerebral cortex, and psoas muscle.
Materials and Methods
Three published whole‐body PBPK models were modified to predict Gd‐CTCs in normal‐appearing tissue. The models differed in the number of organs modeled and total number of compartments, and were designated as the “well‐mixed,” “delay,” and “dispersion” models. The suitability of the three models to predict Gd‐CTC was studied using data from dynamic contrast‐enhanced MR perfusion imaging obtained at 1.5T from 10 patients with glioblastoma multiforme and at 3.0T from five patients with liver metastases.
Results
The dispersion model produced better fits than the delay model in the SSS (P < 0.0001) and cerebral cortex (P < 0.0001), and better fits than the well‐mixed model in psoas muscle (P < 0.005). No model produced better fits than the dispersion model at any of the three locations.
Conclusion
In this evaluation, the dispersion model was most robust for prediction of Gd‐CTCs derived from dynamic contrast‐enhanced (DCE)‐MRI. This represents a preliminary step in the development of a PBPK model useful for predicting Gd‐CTCs at a time resolution appropriate for dynamic MRI applications. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2008;27:1388–1398. © 2008 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.