✦ LIBER ✦

Rebuttal to Bouzas and Rueda

✍ Scribed by D. Scott Lim; Michael Ragosta; John M. Dent

Book ID: 101825217
Publisher: John Wiley and Sons
Year: 2009
Tongue: English
Weight: 25 KB
Volume: 73
Category: Article
ISSN: 1522-1946
DOI: 10.1002/ccd.21752

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Rebuttal to “feminism, psychotherapy and

Rebuttal to “feminism, psychotherapy and professionalism”

✍ Richard C. Robertiello 📂 Article 📅 1973 🏛 Springer US 🌐 English ⚖ 115 KB

Rebuttal to Drs. Nout and Creutzberg

✍ Nicholas S. Reed; Rosie L. Harrand 📂 Article 📅 2011 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 52 KB

Rebuttal to Drs. Taghian and Bourgier

✍ David E. Wazer 📂 Article 📅 2009 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 45 KB

Rebuttal to Drs. Morris, Halperin, and S

Rebuttal to Drs. Morris, Halperin, and Spadinger

✍ Richard G. Stock 📂 Article 📅 2010 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 56 KB

Rebuttal to Drs. Stewart, Devlin, and Mu

Rebuttal to Drs. Stewart, Devlin, and Mutyala

✍ Susan E. Davidson 📂 Article 📅 2009 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 45 KB

Plaud's rebuttal to Ilardi and Feldman's

Plaud's rebuttal to Ilardi and Feldman's response

✍ Joseph J. Plaud 📂 Article 📅 2001 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 22 KB

In this brief rebuttal to Ilardi and Feldman's response to my commentary on their view of the future of a clinical psychology awash in mentalistic and biological terminology, I wish to respond to two interrelated issues brought up by the authors: the role of causality in psychological inquiry, and t