๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

Rebuttal to Drs. Stewart, Devlin, and Mutyala

โœ Scribed by Susan E. Davidson

Book ID
108075011
Publisher
Elsevier Science
Year
2009
Tongue
English
Weight
45 KB
Volume
8
Category
Article
ISSN
1538-4721

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES

Rebuttal to Drs. Nout and Creutzberg
Rebuttal to Drs. Nout and Creutzberg
โœ Nicholas S. Reed; Rosie L. Harrand ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2011 ๐Ÿ› Elsevier Science ๐ŸŒ English โš– 52 KB
Preambles and resolutions relating to re
Preambles and resolutions relating to revision of U. S. copyright and patent laws**This draft was prepared by Dr. F. E. Stewart, chairman of the Committee on Patents and Trade-marks, A. Ph A., for Dr. S. Solis Cohen, Chairman of the Committee on Scope, U. S. P. IX. It was also submitted in the report of the Committee on Patents and Trade Marks, of the Merchantsโ€™ and Manufacturersโ€™ Association of Philadelphia, composed of Ernest T. Trigg (President Philadelphia Chamber of Commerce), Charles A. Wagner and Dr. F. E. Stewart, and approved. The matter in italics is suggested for revising the present U. S. Copyright and Patent Laws, and the subject is submitted for study by the members of the American Pharmaceutical Association, preparatory to its discussion at the next annual convention. The Committee received instructions at the last meeting to proceed with the revision, and the Chairman is desirous that the subject be carefully considered from every viewpoint.The Committee believes that all ambiguity now existing in the law should be removed in the revision. Provision should also be made in the law so that the inventor of a new process can secure a royalty from the original patentee. Attention is again directed that matter in italics embody the suggestions of the Committee for additions to the copyright, patent and trademark laws.โ€”Editor.
๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1917 ๐Ÿ› Elsevier โš– 998 KB