Reasonable reasons for waiting
β Scribed by Orit E. Tykocinski; Bradley J. Ruffle
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2003
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 85 KB
- Volume
- 16
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0894-3257
- DOI
- 10.1002/bdm.439
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
Abstract
Recent decisionβmaking research claims to establish that, in violation of Savage's normative sureβthing principle, individuals often wait to acquire noninstrumental information and subsequently base their decisions upon this information. The current research suggests that characterizing individuals as pursuing noninstrumental or useless information may be overstated. Through a series of experiments we establish, first, that many people choose to wait, even when waiting provides no additional information at all. Second, the longer people are allowed to wait before having to decide, the more people prefer to wait rather than decide immediately. Third, those individuals who choose to wait are the ones less confident about committing themselves to a decision. For them, the benefit from waiting may be especially valuable by allowing them to come to terms with a lessβthanβideal decision. Copyright Β© 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
In appealing to legal reasoning as a model for understanding the structure of moral reasoning, I do not mean to suggest that the latter is based on the former as a matter of sociological fact. It is more plausible to think that the stronger influence runs in the other direction. But legal reasoning
## C1. C2. R is a primary reason why an agent performed the action A under the description d only if R consists of a pro-attitude of the agent toward actions with a certain property, and a belief of the agent that A, under the description d, has that property. A primary reason for an action is it