Legal reasonings as a model for moral reasoning
- Publisher
- Springer Netherlands
- Year
- 1989
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 987 KB
- Volume
- 8
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0167-5249
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
In appealing to legal reasoning as a model for understanding the structure of moral reasoning, I do not mean to suggest that the latter is based on the former as a matter of sociological fact. It is more plausible to think that the stronger influence runs in the other direction. But legal reasoning is institutionally constrained and better documented than its moral counterpart, and therefore more accessible as well. While its most important structural features may not be fully transparent in the records, the voluminous evidence for them stands open for inspection, making legal reasoning the better model given the analogies that exist.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
P25414. CLIME stands for computerized legal information management and explanation. It is aimed at the development of a legal information server for regulations on the classi"cation (inspection) of ships (MILE), and a generic architecture (shell) for legal information serving (CLIME).
This paper is based on the premise that legal reasoning involves an evaluation of facts, principles, and legal precedent that are inexact, and uncertainty-based methods represent a useful approach for modeling this type of reasoning. By applying three different uncertainty-based methods to the same
Reasoning with cases has been a primary focus of those working in AI and law who have attempted to model legal reasoning. In this paper we put forward a formal model of reasoning with cases which captures many of the insights from that previous work. We begin by stating our view of reasoning with ca