𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Legal reasonings as a model for moral reasoning


Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Year
1989
Tongue
English
Weight
987 KB
Volume
8
Category
Article
ISSN
0167-5249

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


In appealing to legal reasoning as a model for understanding the structure of moral reasoning, I do not mean to suggest that the latter is based on the former as a matter of sociological fact. It is more plausible to think that the stronger influence runs in the other direction. But legal reasoning is institutionally constrained and better documented than its moral counterpart, and therefore more accessible as well. While its most important structural features may not be fully transparent in the records, the voluminous evidence for them stands open for inspection, making legal reasoning the better model given the analogies that exist.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Legal modeling and automated reasoning w
✍ ANDRΓ‰ VALENTE; JOOST BREUKER; BOB BROUWER πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1999 πŸ› Elsevier Science 🌐 English βš– 385 KB

P25414. CLIME stands for computerized legal information management and explanation. It is aimed at the development of a legal information server for regulations on the classi"cation (inspection) of ships (MILE), and a generic architecture (shell) for legal information serving (CLIME).

A comparative study of uncertainty metho
✍ David Woerner; Samir Armaly; Alley Butler; David Fischer πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1999 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 192 KB πŸ‘ 2 views

This paper is based on the premise that legal reasoning involves an evaluation of facts, principles, and legal precedent that are inexact, and uncertainty-based methods represent a useful approach for modeling this type of reasoning. By applying three different uncertainty-based methods to the same

A model of legal reasoning with cases in
✍ Trevor Bench-Capon; Giovanni Sartor πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2003 πŸ› Elsevier Science 🌐 English βš– 431 KB

Reasoning with cases has been a primary focus of those working in AI and law who have attempted to model legal reasoning. In this paper we put forward a formal model of reasoning with cases which captures many of the insights from that previous work. We begin by stating our view of reasoning with ca