𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Rate of consistency of one sample tests of location

✍ Scribed by Jana Jurečková

Publisher
Elsevier Science
Year
1980
Tongue
English
Weight
752 KB
Volume
4
Category
Article
ISSN
0378-3758

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

One-sample run tests of symmetry
One-sample run tests of symmetry
✍ Jonathan P. Cohen; Shailendra S. Menjoge 📂 Article 📅 1988 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 451 KB
Robustness of Statistical Tests in the T
Robustness of Statistical Tests in the Two-Sample Location Problem
✍ O. Marrero 📂 Article 📅 1985 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 771 KB

A simulation study was performed to compare three statistical tests with respect to their performances in the two-sample location problem for contaminated normal distributions. The three tests were: the t-test, the rank-transformed t-test, and the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. The results showed the t-tes

One- and Two-Sample Tests of Kendall's τ
One- and Two-Sample Tests of Kendall's τ
✍ Doz. Dr. M. Schemper 📂 Article 📅 1987 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 349 KB

Several methods of testing general one-sample and two-sample hypotheses of Kendall's r are diecussed. The performance of these procedures in typical situations likely to occur in practioe was investigated by numerou8 Monte Carlo experimenfa The common one-sample feet (610 : T = 0) based on the permu

On the Rate of Strong Consistency of the
On the Rate of Strong Consistency of the Total Time on Test Statistic
✍ Miklós Csörgő; Ričardas Zitikis 📂 Article 📅 1998 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 318 KB

We give a complete description of the rate of strong consistency of the scaled and unscaled total time on test curves, which are fundamental notions in the statistical theory of reliability and life testing. The proof is crucially based on the general Vervaat process.

Uniform strong consistency of sample qua
Uniform strong consistency of sample quantiles
✍ Ryszard Zieliński 📂 Article 📅 1998 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 215 KB

It is well known that if xq(F) is the unique qth quantile of a distribution function F, then Xk(,):, with k(n)/n--~ q is a strongly consistent estimator of xq(F). However, for every e > 0 and for every, even very large n, suPFe: ~ PF{IXk<,):, -xq(F)l >/3} = 1. This is a consequence of the fact that