Randomization methods and the analysis of multivariate ecological data
โ Scribed by Eric P. Smith
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 1998
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 181 KB
- Volume
- 9
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 1180-4009
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
โฆ Synopsis
Data from ecological and biomonitoring studies are sometimes dicult to make inferences from owing to the high dimensionality of the data, the lack of normality and other problems. One approach for testing which has interested researchers is the randomization method. A general approach is based on replacing the multivariate data with distances between units, choosing a test statistic to summarize dierences (due say to a treatment) and using a randomization test to assess the signiยฎcance of the dierences.
This paper discusses a number of questions and concerns related to analysis and interpretation using this analytical approach. First, what can be said about the power of this test and how is the power related to the power of other tests under optimal conditions? Second, the variables (species) seem to get lost in the analysis. How important are they and should one be concerned about their importance to the power of the test? Finally, how important are assumptions about the data? These questions and others are discussed using examples from multispecies studies.
๐ SIMILAR VOLUMES
A simulation study has been carried out to compare the results from using dierent randomization methods to assess the signiยฎcance of the F-statistics for factor eects with analysis of variance. Two-way and threeway designs with and without replication were considered, with the randomization of obser
Clustered data are the rule in many clinical specialties such as ophthalmology. Methods have been developed for the treatment of clustered continuous or binary outcome data. Less attention has been given to ordinal outcomes which occur frequently in ophthalmology. For example, grading systems of cat