๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

Analysis of variance by randomization with small data sets

โœ Scribed by Liliana Gonzalez; Bryan F. J. Manly


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
1998
Tongue
English
Weight
132 KB
Volume
9
Category
Article
ISSN
1180-4009

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


A simulation study has been carried out to compare the results from using dierent randomization methods to assess the signiยฎcance of the F-statistics for factor eects with analysis of variance. Two-way and threeway designs with and without replication were considered, with the randomization of observations, the restricted randomization of observations, and the randomization of dierent types of residuals. Data from normal, uniform, exponential, and an empirical distribution were considered. It was found that usually all methods of randomization gave similar results, as did the use of the usual F-distribution tables, and that no method of analysis was clearly superior to the others under all conditions.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


A threeโ€“step algorithm for CANDECOMP/PAR
โœ Henk A. L. Kiers ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1998 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 160 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 1 views

Fitting the CANDECOMP/PARAFAC model by the standard alternating least squares algorithm often requires very many iterations. One case in point is that of analysing data with mild to severe multicollinearity. If, in addition, the size of the data is large, the computation of one CANDECOMP/PARAFAC sol

Analysis of data from group-randomized t
โœ David M. Murray; Peter J. Hannan; Russell D. Wolfinger; William L. Baker; James ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1998 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 208 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 2 views

This study used Monte Carlo simulations to evaluate the performance of alternative models for the analysis of group-randomized trials having more than two time intervals for data collection. The major distinction among the models tested was the sampling variance of the intervention effect. In the mi