✦ LIBER ✦

Quantitative and qualitative comparison of 3.0 T and 1.5 T MR imaging of the liver in patients with diffuse parenchymal liver disease

✍ Scribed by Masakatsu Tsurusaki; Richard C. Semelka; Mauricio Zapparoli; Jorge Elias Jr.; Ersan Altun; Ertan Pamuklar; Kazuro Sugimura

Book ID: 116439956
Publisher: Elsevier Science
Year: 2009
Tongue: English
Weight: 718 KB
Volume: 72
Category: Article
ISSN: 0720-048X
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2008.07.027

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

MR imaging of articular cartilage at 1.5

MR imaging of articular cartilage at 1.5 T and 3.0 T: Comparison of SPGR and SSFP sequences

✍ P.R. Kornaat; S.B. Reeder; S. Koo; J.H. Brittain; H. Yu; T.P. Andriacchi; G.E. G 📂 Article 📅 2005 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 354 KB

Cardiac cine MRI: Comparison of 1.5&#xa0

Cardiac cine MRI: Comparison of 1.5 T, non-enhanced 3.0 T and blood pool enhanced 3.0 T imaging

✍ S.C. Gerretsen; B. Versluis; S.C.A.M. Bekkers; T. Leiner 📂 Article 📅 2008 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 776 KB

Value of 3.0 T MR imaging in refrac

Value of 3.0 T MR imaging in refractory partial epilepsy and negative 1.5 T MRI

✍ Dang Khoa Nguyen; Émilie Rochette; Jean-Maxime Leroux; Gilles Beaudoin; Patrick 📂 Article 📅 2010 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 104 KB

Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Perfus

Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Perfusion Imaging at 3 T for the Detection of Coronary Artery Disease: A Comparison with 1.5 T

✍ T.J. Pegg; A.S. Cheng; T.D. Karamitsos; M.D. Robson; N. Searle; M. Jerosch-Herol 📂 Article 📅 2007 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 80 KB

Quantitative and qualitative comparison

Quantitative and qualitative comparison of 1.5 and 3.0 tesla MRI in patients with chronic liver diseases

✍ Miguel Ramalho; Vasco Herédia; Masakatsu Tsurusaki; Ersan Altun; Richard C. Seme 📂 Article 📅 2009 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 411 KB

## Abstract ## Purpose To compare the quantitative and qualitative image quality intra‐individually, at 1.5 and 3.0 Tesla (T) in patients with chronic liver diseases. ## Materials and Methods The study group included 24 consecutive patients (17 males, 7 females; mean age ± standard deviation 56.

Non-invasive quantification of hepatic f

Non-invasive quantification of hepatic fat fraction by fast 1.0, 1.5 and 3.0 T MR imaging

✍ Sebastian Schuchmann; Christiane Weigel; Lothar Albrecht; Michael Kirsch; Arne L 📂 Article 📅 2007 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 651 KB

Quantitative and qualitative comparison of 3.0&#xa0;T and 1.5&#xa0;T MR imaging of the liver in patients with diffuse parenchymal liver disease

Quantitative and qualitative comparison of 3.0 T and 1.5 T MR imaging of the liver in patients with diffuse parenchymal liver disease