✦ LIBER ✦

Non-invasive quantification of hepatic fat fraction by fast 1.0, 1.5 and 3.0 T MR imaging

✍ Scribed by Sebastian Schuchmann; Christiane Weigel; Lothar Albrecht; Michael Kirsch; Arne Lemke; Gerd Lorenz; Rolf Warzok; Norbert Hosten

Book ID: 116439476
Publisher: Elsevier Science
Year: 2007
Tongue: English
Weight: 651 KB
Volume: 62
Category: Article
ISSN: 0720-048X
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2006.12.009

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Cardiac cine MRI: Comparison of 1.5&#xa0

Cardiac cine MRI: Comparison of 1.5 T, non-enhanced 3.0 T and blood pool enhanced 3.0 T imaging

✍ S.C. Gerretsen; B. Versluis; S.C.A.M. Bekkers; T. Leiner 📂 Article 📅 2008 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 776 KB

Value of 3.0 T MR imaging in refrac

Value of 3.0 T MR imaging in refractory partial epilepsy and negative 1.5 T MRI

✍ Dang Khoa Nguyen; Émilie Rochette; Jean-Maxime Leroux; Gilles Beaudoin; Patrick 📂 Article 📅 2010 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 104 KB

MR imaging of articular cartilage at 1.5

MR imaging of articular cartilage at 1.5 T and 3.0 T: Comparison of SPGR and SSFP sequences

✍ P.R. Kornaat; S.B. Reeder; S. Koo; J.H. Brittain; H. Yu; T.P. Andriacchi; G.E. G 📂 Article 📅 2005 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 354 KB

Quantitative and qualitative comparison

Quantitative and qualitative comparison of 3.0 T and 1.5 T MR imaging of the liver in patients with diffuse parenchymal liver disease

✍ Masakatsu Tsurusaki; Richard C. Semelka; Mauricio Zapparoli; Jorge Elias Jr.; Er 📂 Article 📅 2009 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 718 KB

Dynamic pulmonary perfusion and flow qua

Dynamic pulmonary perfusion and flow quantification with MR imaging, 3.0T vs. 1.5T: Initial results

✍ Kambiz Nael; Henrik J. Michaely; Margaret Lee; Jonathan Goldin; Gerhard Laub; J. 📂 Article 📅 2006 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 222 KB

## Abstract ## Purpose To prospectively evaluate the technical feasibility and relative performance of pulmonary time‐resolved MR angiography (MRA) and pulmonary artery (PA) flow quantification at 3.0T vs. 1.5T. ## Materials and Methods Time‐resolved contrast‐enhanced (CE) MRA of the pulmonary c

Accurate fat fraction quantification by

Accurate fat fraction quantification by multiecho gradient-recalled-echo magnetic resonance at 1.5 T in rats with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease

✍ Elizabeth Hijona; Javier Sánchez-González; Jose M. Alústiza; Lander Hijona; Juan 📂 Article 📅 2012 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 658 KB

Non-invasive quantification of hepatic fat fraction by fast 1.0, 1.5 and 3.0&#xa0;T MR imaging

Non-invasive quantification of hepatic fat fraction by fast 1.0, 1.5 and 3.0 T MR imaging