𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Quantitative analysis of the bone-hydroxyapatite coating interface

✍ Scribed by S. Stea; M. Visentin; L. Savarino; M. E. Donati; A. Pizzoferrato; A. Moroni; V. Caja


Book ID
104630736
Publisher
Springer
Year
1995
Tongue
English
Weight
456 KB
Volume
6
Category
Article
ISSN
0957-4530

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


The bone implant interface in stainless steel pins coated with hydroxyapatite, used in a monoaxial fracture external fixation system was examined. The pins were transversally inserted into sheep tibial diaphyses where a defect was created, and they were loaded for 6 weeks. Uncoated pins were implanted as control. The microscopic relation between bone and implant was quantified through image analysis: the residual thickness of the hydroxyapatite coating, pin-bone contact surface and bone ingrowth value in between the threads were measured. The bone tissue at the interface appeared regularly mineralized and viable both in the implants of coated pins and in the control uncoated ones. The ceramic coating showed a slight and not statistically significant increase in thickness. The ceramic coated pins presented contact with bone higher than the uncoated pins (75.6 _+ 20.0 versus 47.5 _+ 19.4); they also induced a higher bone ingrowth (86.6 _+ 22.4 versus 78.7 _+ 13.5). Both differences are not statistically significant, but suggestive of a trend. The authors concluded that the hydroxyapatite coating of the pins might improve the performance of external fixators, by favouring bone apposition and reducing rate of loosening.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Bone ingrowth analysis and interface eva
✍ A. Moroni; V. L. Caja; C. Sabato; E. L. Egger; F. Gottsauner-Wolf; E. Y. S. Chao πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1994 πŸ› Springer 🌐 English βš– 661 KB

Fourteen titanium porous-coated implants with a cylindrical shape (length 22 mm and diameter 5\_+0.3 mm) were prepared. Bead size was 250-350 gm. Seven implants were plasma-sprayed with hydroxyapatite and the other seven remained uncoated. Implants, both hydroxyapatite-coated and uncoated, were rand

Comparison of bone-implant interface she
✍ Hayashi, K. ;Inadome, T. ;Mashima, T. ;Sugioka, Y. πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1993 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 772 KB

The interface shear strength of uncoated Ti-6A1-4V, dense sintered hydroxyapatite (HA), and HA-coated Ti-6A1-4V were compared. Interface shear strength was determined using a transcortical push-out model in dogs 4 and 12 weeks after implantation. The interface shear strength of dense sintered HA and

Evolution of the bone-titanium interface
✍ Chappard, D. ;Grizon, F. ;Brechet, I. ;BaslοΏ½, M. F. ;Rebel, A. πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1996 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 658 KB

Titanium cylinders having a sandblasted surface were implanted in holes drilled in the internal condyles of rabbit femurs. The right side received a titanium implant coated with xenogeneic bone particles and the left side received a titanium cylinder alone and was used as control. The femoral extrem

Comparison of bone-implant interface she
✍ Inadome, T. ;Hayashi, K. ;Nakashima, Y. ;Tsumura, H. ;Sugioka, Y. πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1995 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 691 KB

We performed a transcortical push-out test to determine the effect of surface roughness of hydroxyapatite (HA)coated implants on bone-implant shear strength in a canine model. Hydroxyapatite-and alumina-coated SUS316L with the same surface roughness (roughness average: Ra = 5 pm) and HA-coated Ti-6A