𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Quantitation of differential renal blood flow and renal function using dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in rats

✍ Scribed by Michael Pedersen; Yimin Shi; Peter Anderson; Hans Stødkilde-Jørgensen; Jens Christian Djurhuus; Isky Gordon; Jørgen Frøkiær


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2004
Tongue
English
Weight
338 KB
Volume
51
Category
Article
ISSN
0740-3194

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Abstract

A first‐pass upslope approach was used to estimate differential renal blood flow (DRBF) and a Patlak‐Rutland approach was used to estimate differential renal function (DRF) using Gd‐DTPA‐BMA‐enhanced MRI. DRBF and DRF were estimated in rat kidneys under three different experimental conditions: 1) transient renal artery occlusion (TRAO); 2) partial unilateral ureteric obstruction (PUO); and 3) sham‐operated control rats (SHAM). A bolus of Gd‐DTPA‐BMA was given intravenously during a dynamic single slice T~1~‐weighted gradient echo sequence, which allowed calculation of concentration from signal intensity values. Calculations based on the raw signal intensity showed that DRBF was decreased in both PUO (44 ± 1%; P < 0.05) and in TRAO (38 ± 1%; P < 0.05) compared with SHAM (52 ± 1%). Converting the signal intensity into a measure of Gd‐DTPA‐BMA concentration did not substantially alter these findings (PUO: 40 ± 3%, P < 0.05; TRAO: 35 ± 2%, P < 0.05; SHAM 49 ± 1%). Likewise, DRF decreased in both PUO (43 ± 4%; P < 0.05) and TRAO (39 ± 3%; P < 0.05) compared with SHAM (48 ± 2%). Converting the signal intensity into measurements of Gd‐DTPA‐BMA concentration revealed similar findings (PUO: 41 ± 5%, P < 0.05; TRAO: 34 ± 5%, P < 0.05; SHAM: 49 ± 2%). Our results suggest that renal damage in rats may be demonstrated by an observed reduction of DRBF and DRF as estimated from single‐slice Gd‐DTPA‐BMA enhanced signal intensity using time–activity curves with and without quantitation of Gd‐concentration. Magn Reson Med 51:510–517, 2004. © 2004 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.


📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES


Dynamic MRI contrast enhancement of rena
✍ Stephen J. Gandy; Thiru A.P. Sudarshan; Declan G. Sheppard; Lynsay C. Allan; Tru 📂 Article 📅 2003 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 416 KB

## Abstract ## Purpose To evaluate differences in the magnitude and time course of renal cortical contrast uptake in patients with minimal, moderate, and severe renal artery stenosis (RAS) using contrast‐enhanced magnetic resonance renography (CE‐MRR). ## Materials and Methods CE‐MRR was perform

Use of cardiac output to improve measure
✍ Jeff L. Zhang; Henry Rusinek; Louisa Bokacheva; Qun Chen; Pippa Storey; Vivian S 📂 Article 📅 2009 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 488 KB

## Abstract ## Purpose To validate a new method for converting MR arterial signal intensity versus time curves to arterial input functions (AIFs). ## Materials and Methods The method constrains AIF with patient's cardiac output (Q). Monte Carlo simulations of MR renography and tumor perfusion pr

Quantitative measurement of blood-brain
✍ Saeid Taheri; Charles Gasparovic; Nadim Jon Shah; Gary A. Rosenberg 📂 Article 📅 2010 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 301 KB

## Abstract Breakdown of the blood‐brain barrier (BBB), occurring in many neurological diseases, has been difficult to measure noninvasively in humans. Dynamic contrast‐enhanced magnetic resonance imaging measures BBB permeability. However, important technical challenges remain and normative data f

How accurate is dynamic contrast-enhance
✍ Iosif Mendichovszky; Michael Pedersen; Jørgen Frøkiær; Thomas Dissing; Nicolas G 📂 Article 📅 2008 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 113 KB

## Abstract ## Purpose To evaluate the current literature to see if the published results of MRI‐glomerular filtration rate (GFR) stand up to the claim that MRI‐GFR may be used in clinical practice. Claims in the current literature that Gadolinium (Gd) DTPA dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE) MRI clea