𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Quality assurance measurements of a-si epid performance

✍ Scribed by Geetha V Menon; Ron S Sloboda


Publisher
Elsevier Science
Year
2004
Tongue
English
Weight
264 KB
Volume
29
Category
Article
ISSN
0958-3947

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


The performance stability of a Varian aS500 amorphous silicon (a-Si) electronic portal imaging device (EPID) was monitored over an 18-month period using a variety of standard quality assurance (QA) tests. The tests were selected to provide ongoing information about image quality and dose response from the time of EPID acceptance into clinical service. To evaluate imaging performance, we made spatial resolution and contrast measurements using both PortalVision and QC-3V phantoms for 6-and 15-MV photon beams at repetition rates of 100, 300, and 400 MU/min in standard scanning mode. To assess operational stability for dosimetry applications, we measured central axis radiation response and beam pulse variability for the same image acquisition modes. Using the QC-3V phantom, values for the critical frequency of 0.435 ؎ 0.005 lp/mm for 6 MV and 0.382 ؎ 0.003 lp/mm for 15 MV were obtained. The contrast-to-noise ratio was found to be ϳ20% higher for the lower photon energy. Beam pulse variability remained within the tolerance of 3% set by the manufacturer. The central axis pixel response of the EPID remained constant within ؎1% over a 5-month period for the 6-MV beam, but fell ϳ4% over the same period for the 15-MV beam. The Varian aS500 EPID studied exhibited consistent image quality and a stable radiation response. These characteristics render it suitable for quantitative applications such as clinical dose measurement.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Performance of a diagnostic system (Ilia
✍ Lee Min Lau; Homer R. Warner πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1992 πŸ› Elsevier Science 🌐 English βš– 634 KB

Quality assurance improves health care through detection ofquality problems and feedback to the care giver. Current review procedures employed by the Peer Review Organizations (PROS), however, appear to underdetect quality problems, particularly those arising from diagnostic errors. We studied the u

Patient education β€” a perspective of qua
✍ L OlsΓ©ni; B Berben πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1994 πŸ› Elsevier Science 🌐 English βš– 69 KB

m 'QUALITY OF CARE' M&i l. B Be&n, fhriwmio IiospM S-221 d.5 M, snadca 1ntbekmfowycarswehaveplwatedcuunesfora5tb. matic patknbr lZecentb va have revimved tbc need far such DNE-ti conducted b&dual educrtirm szssbms.of 1 to 1 and l/2 b per patient usiy a Itandardii edu@mpmb& mlwhichaS3DNEm~innd~dbsdw&