𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Purification of Nano-Porous Silicon for Biomedical Applications

✍ Scribed by Svetoslav Koynov; Rui N. Pereira; Ivo Crnolatac; Dmitry Kovalev; Ann Huygens; Vladimir Chirvony; Martin Stutzmann; Peter de Witte


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2011
Tongue
English
Weight
556 KB
Volume
13
Category
Article
ISSN
1438-1656

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.


📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES


Porous Silicon Microcavities for Biosens
✍ Chan, S. ;Fauchet, P.M. ;Li, Y. ;Rothberg, L.J. ;Miller, B.L. 📂 Article 📅 2000 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 127 KB 👁 1 views

Porous silicon microcavity resonators possess the unique characteristics of line narrowing and luminescence enhancement. The emission peak position is completely tunable by changing the properties of the central layer. Increasing the thickness of the central active layer introduces multiple narrow p

Functional and Highly Porous Scaffolds f
✍ Therese Tyson; Sofia Målberg; Veronica Wåtz; Anna Finne-Wistrand; Ann-Christine 📂 Article 📅 2011 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 969 KB

## Abstract Highly porous functional scaffolds were obtained from linear and cross‐linked multifunctional poly(ε‐caprolactone) and poly(L‐lactide). The polymers were synthesized by ring‐opening polymerization of ε‐caprolactone and L‐lactide using poly(but‐2‐ene‐1,4‐diyl malonate) (PBM) as macroinit

Liquid Phase Epitaxial Growth of Silicon
✍ S. Berger; S. Quoizola; A. Fave; A. Ouldabbes; A. Kaminski; S. Perichon; N-E. Ch 📂 Article 📅 2001 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 198 KB 👁 2 views

The aim of this experiment is to grow a thin silicon layer (<50µm) by Liquid Phase Epitaxy (LPE) onto porous silicon. This one acts as a sacrificial layer in order to transfer the 50 µm epitaxial layer onto foreign substrates like ceramics. After transfer, the silicon wafer is then re-usable. In thi

Ultrastructural comparison of hydroxyapa
✍ Porter, Alexandra E. ;Best, Serena M. ;Bonfield, William 📂 Article 📅 2003 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 422 KB

## Abstract Silicon‐substituted hydroxyapatite (Si‐HA) has been shown to lead to significantly increased rates of bone apposition when compared with phase‐pure hydroxyapatite (HA) bioceramic implants (Patel N, et al. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2002;13:1199–1206). However, uncertainty remains about the m