The literature defines nondirectiveness as a genetic counseling strategy that supports autonomous decision-making by clients [Fine, 1993]. This study surveyed 781 full members of the National Society of Genetic Counselors (NSGC) between April and June, 1993, to assess how they define nondirectivenes
Psychological aspects of genetic counseling. XI. Nondirectiveness revisited
โ Scribed by Kessler, Seymour
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 1997
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 15 KB
- Volume
- 72
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0148-7299
- DOI
- 10.1002/(sici)1096-8628(19971017)72:2<164::aid-ajmg8>3.0.co;2-v
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
โฆ Synopsis
Directiveness and nondirectiveness are considered here as psychological phenomena and separated from the issue of giving or withholding advice. The former is a form of persuasive communication involving various combinations of deception, coercion, and threat, whereas the latter describes procedures that promote and enhance the autonomy and self-directedness of clients. Examples are given showing that professionals have considerable difficulty dealing with relatively simple, common issues arising in genetic counseling. It is suggested that many, if not most, problems involving the issue of nondirectiveness arise because of inadequacies in applying basic counseling skills. Several examples are given of nondirective counseling in situations involving direct questions and the proffering of ''advice.'' The need to raise standards in counseling training is underscored if the field of genetic counseling is to remain nondirective. Am. J. Med. Genet. 72:164-171, 1997.
๐ SIMILAR VOLUMES
Recently we published a review about genetic counseling and the provision of risk information in Angelman syndrome (AS) ]. However, since then, new evidence indicates that gonadal mosaicism may affect recurrence risk in the subset of AS patients who are affected as the result of UBE3A gene mutations
The causal heterogeneity of Angelman syndrome (AS) makes providing information regarding recurrence risk both important and challenging, and may have a dramatic impact on reproductive decision-making for the nuclear and extended family. Most cases of AS result from typical large de novo deletions of