๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

Genetic counseling in Mexico

โœ Scribed by Wertz, Dorothy C.


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
1998
Tongue
English
Weight
3 KB
Volume
75
Category
Article
ISSN
0148-7299
DOI
10.1002/(sici)1096-8628(19980203)75:4<424::aid-ajmg15>3.0.co;2-q

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Genetic counseling in Angelman syndrome:
โœ Stalker, Heather J.; Williams, Charles A.; Wagstaff, Joseph ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1998 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 2 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 2 views

Recently we published a review about genetic counseling and the provision of risk information in Angelman syndrome (AS) ]. However, since then, new evidence indicates that gonadal mosaicism may affect recurrence risk in the subset of AS patients who are affected as the result of UBE3A gene mutations

Nondirectiveness in genetic counseling:
โœ Bartels, Dianne M.; LeRoy, Bonnie S.; McCarthy, Patricia; Caplan, Arthur L. ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1997 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 38 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 1 views

The literature defines nondirectiveness as a genetic counseling strategy that supports autonomous decision-making by clients [Fine, 1993]. This study surveyed 781 full members of the National Society of Genetic Counselors (NSGC) between April and June, 1993, to assess how they define nondirectivenes

Genetic counseling in Angelman syndrome:
โœ Stalker, Heather J.; Williams, Charles A. ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1998 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 30 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 1 views

The causal heterogeneity of Angelman syndrome (AS) makes providing information regarding recurrence risk both important and challenging, and may have a dramatic impact on reproductive decision-making for the nuclear and extended family. Most cases of AS result from typical large de novo deletions of

Psychological aspects of genetic counsel
โœ Kessler, Seymour ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1997 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 15 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 1 views

Directiveness and nondirectiveness are considered here as psychological phenomena and separated from the issue of giving or withholding advice. The former is a form of persuasive communication involving various combinations of deception, coercion, and threat, whereas the latter describes procedures