𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Protein location and elemental composition of urine spheres in different avian species

✍ Scribed by Casotti, Giovanni ;Braun, Eldon J.


Book ID
102339475
Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2004
Tongue
English
Weight
260 KB
Volume
301A
Category
Article
ISSN
0022-104X

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Abstract

We examined the internal morphology, location of protein, and identity and location of elements, in avian urate‐containing spheres in 9 species of birds. The urine spheres were collected from voided samples. The spheres ranged in size from 0.5–5.0 µm, except in the domestic fowl, where they ranged up to 10 µm in diameter. The internal morphology of the spheres was examined using freeze‐fracture microscopy. Protein location within the spheres was identified using fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC). The urine spheres were analyzed for content and internal location of elements using Energy Dispersal System Analysis (EDS). Internally, the spheres consisted of a central nidus surrounded by 3–4 concentric narrow rings of protein. Elements found within the spheres included nitrogen, potassium, calcium, sodium, phosphorus, chloride and sulfur; however, only nitrogen, potassium and chloride were common in the spheres of all species. Nitrogen comprised the majority of the elemental content of the spheres (77–90%) followed by potassium (8–45%), with all other ions present in trace amounts. Unlike protein, the location of elements was random within the spheres. Protein and urate are both negatively charged and known to associate to form the spheres and as potassium is the only cation common to all spheres, it too may play a role in their formation. J. Exp. Zool. 301A:579–587, 2004. © 2004 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.


📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES


Species differences in cis-elements of t
✍ Beverly Peterkofsky; Anna Gosiewska; Kamal Singh; Stacey Pearlman; Fatemeh Mahmo 📂 Article 📅 1999 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 259 KB

Previous studies suggest that there may be species differences in the utilization of cis-elements of the type I collagen genes. The present study was designed to examine this possibility by focusing on two regions of the pro␣1(I) collagen promoter. One is the GC-rich A1 region (Ϫ194/168) that modula