Protein dynamics and conformational disorder in molecular recognition
✍ Scribed by Tanja Mittag; Lewis E. Kay; Julie D. Forman-Kay
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2009
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 616 KB
- Volume
- 23
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0952-3499
- DOI
- 10.1002/jmr.961
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Abstract
Recognition requires protein flexibility because it facilitates conformational rearrangements and induced‐fit mechanisms upon target binding. Intrinsic disorder is an extreme on the continuous spectrum of possible protein dynamics and its role in recognition may seem counterintuitive. However, conformational disorder is widely found in many eukaryotic regulatory proteins involved in processes such as signal transduction and transcription. Disordered protein regions may in fact confer advantages over folded proteins in binding. Rapidly interconverting and diverse conformers may create mean electrostatic fields instead of presenting discrete charges. The resultant “polyelectrostatic” interactions allow for the utilization of post‐translational modifications as a means to change the net charge and thereby modify the electrostatic interaction of a disordered region. Plasticity of disordered protein states enables steric advantages over folded proteins and allows for unique binding configurations. Disorder may also have evolutionary advantages, as it facilitates alternative splicing, domain shuffling and protein modularity. As proteins exist in a continuous spectrum of disorder, so do their complexes. Indeed, disordered regions in complexes may control the degree of motion between domains, mask binding sites, be targets of post‐translational modifications, permit overlapping binding motifs, and enable transient binding of different binding partners, making them excellent candidates for signal integrators and explaining their prevalence in eukaryotic signaling pathways. “Dynamic” complexes arise if more than two transient protein interfaces are involved in complex formation of two binding partners in a dynamic equilibrium. “Disordered” complexes, in contrast, do not involve significant ordering of interacting protein segments but rely exclusively on transient contacts. The nature of these interactions is not well understood yet but advancements in the structural characterization of disordered states will help us gain insights into their function and their implications for health and disease. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Abstract **Intrinsically disordered proteins** exist and function without well‐defined three‐dimensional structures and are common in proteomes where they carry out essential functions. Herein, evidence for their lack of structure and the major functional benefits that this confers, are surveyed
An alg~orithm for the recognition of the formation of bound molecular states in the computer simulation of a dilule ga~ L~ pre.\*.enled. Apptication~ to various related problems in physics and che;aistr y are pointed out. Data structure and ded~m proce~e~ are described. Performar, ce of the FORTRAN
The past year has brought new insights into common structural motifs used for protein-protein interactions by DNA-binding proteins. In addition, there have been significant advances in our understanding of antibody-protein complexes.