## Abstract The game domination number of a (simple, undirected) graph is defined by the following game. Two players, \documentclass{article}\usepackage{amssymb}\usepackage{amsbsy}\usepackage[mathscr]{euscript}\footskip=0pc\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}${\mathcal{A}}$\end{document} and \docume
Proof of a conjecture in domination theory
โ Scribed by Igor E. Zverovich
- Publisher
- Elsevier Science
- Year
- 1998
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 76 KB
- Volume
- 184
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0012-365X
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
โฆ Synopsis
A dominating set D of a graph G is a least dominating set (I.d.s) if y((D)) < 2~((D~)) for any dominating set D1 (7 denotes domination number). The least domination number ~ ~ (G) of G is the minimum cardinality of a 1.d.s. We prove a conjecture of Sampathkumar (1990) that Vl ~< 3p/5 for any connected graph G of order p/> 2.
๐ SIMILAR VOLUMES
Let G = (V, E) be a graph and N G [v] the closed neighborhood of a vertex v in G. For k โ N, the minimum cardinality of a set In this note we prove the following conjecture of Rautenbach and Volkmann [D. Rautenbach, L. Volkmann, New bounds on the k-domination number and the k-tuple domination numbe
The aim of this paper is to show that for any n ยฅ N, n > 3, there exist a, b ยฅ N\* such that n=a+b, the ''lengths'' of a and b having the same parity (see the text for the definition of the ''length'' of a natural number). Also we will show that for any n ยฅ N, n > 2, n ] 5, 10, there exist a, b ยฅ N\
Let P(G, \*) denote the chromatic polynomial of a graph G. It is proved in this paper that for every connected graph G of order n and real number \* n, (\*&2) n&1 P(G, \*)&\*(\*&1) n&2 P(G, \*&1) 0. By this result, the following conjecture proposed by Bartels and Welsh is proved: P(G, n)(P(G, n&1))