๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

Proof of a conjecture on game domination

โœ Scribed by O. Favaron; H. Karami; R. Khoeilar; S. M. Sheikholeslami; L. Volkmann


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2009
Tongue
English
Weight
87 KB
Volume
64
Category
Article
ISSN
0364-9024

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


Abstract

The game domination number of a (simple, undirected) graph is defined by the following game. Two players,
\documentclass{article}\usepackage{amssymb}\usepackage{amsbsy}\usepackage[mathscr]{euscript}\footskip=0pc\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}${\mathcal{A}}$\end{document} and
\documentclass{article}\usepackage{amssymb}\usepackage{amsbsy}\usepackage[mathscr]{euscript}\footskip=0pc\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}${\mathcal{D}}$\end{document}, orient the edges of the graph alternately until all edges are oriented. Player
\documentclass{article}\usepackage{amssymb}\usepackage{amsbsy}\usepackage[mathscr]{euscript}\footskip=0pc\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}${\mathcal{D}}$\end{document} starts the game, and his goal is to decrease the domination number of the resulting digraph, while
\documentclass{article}\usepackage{amssymb}\usepackage{amsbsy}\usepackage[mathscr]{euscript}\footskip=0pc\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}${\mathcal{A}}$\end{document} is trying to increase it. The game domination number of the graph G, denoted by ฮณ~g~(G), is the domination number of the directed graph resulting from this game. This is well defined if we suppose that both players follow their optimal strategies. Alon et al. (Discrete Math 256 (2002), 23โ€“33) conjectured that, if both G and \documentclass{article}\usepackage{amssymb}\usepackage{amsbsy}\usepackage[mathscr]{euscript}\footskip=0pc\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$\overline{G}$\end{document} are connected graphs with n vertices, then \documentclass{article}\usepackage{amssymb}\usepackage{amsbsy}\usepackage[mathscr]{euscript}\footskip=0pc\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$\gamma_{g}(G)+\gamma_{g}(\overline{G})\le\frac{2}{3}{n}+{3}$\end{document}. In this paper we prove that this conjecture is true for nโฉพ41. ยฉ 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Graph Theory 64: 323โ€“329, 2010


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


On a conjecture of Aris: Proof and remar
โœ Dan Luss; Neal R. Amundson ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1967 ๐Ÿ› American Institute of Chemical Engineers ๐ŸŒ English โš– 428 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 2 views
Proof of a conjecture on fractional Rams
โœ Jason Brown; Richard Hoshino ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2009 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 144 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 1 views

## Abstract Jacobson, Levin, and Scheinerman introduced the fractional Ramsey function __r__~__f__~ (__a__~1~, __a__~2~, โ€ฆ, __a__~__k__~) as an extension of the classical definition for Ramsey numbers. They determined an exact formula for the fractional Ramsey function for the case __k__=2. In this

Proof of a conjecture on irredundance pe
โœ Lutz Volkmann; Vadim E. Zverovich ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2002 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 157 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 1 views

## Abstract Let __ir__(__G__) and ฮณ(__G__) be the irredundance number and the domination number of a graph __G__, respectively. A graph __G__ is called __irredundance perfect__ if __ir__(__H__)=ฮณ(__H__), for every induced subgraph __H__ of __G__. In this article we present a result which immediatel

Proof of a conjecture of nirenberg
โœ Robert Osserman ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1959 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 209 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 1 views
Proof of a Chromatic Polynomial Conjectu
โœ F.M. Dong ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2000 ๐Ÿ› Elsevier Science ๐ŸŒ English โš– 138 KB

Let P(G, \*) denote the chromatic polynomial of a graph G. It is proved in this paper that for every connected graph G of order n and real number \* n, (\*&2) n&1 P(G, \*)&\*(\*&1) n&2 P(G, \*&1) 0. By this result, the following conjecture proposed by Bartels and Welsh is proved: P(G, n)(P(G, n&1))

Proof of a conjecture on cycles in a bip
โœ Wang, Hong ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1999 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 244 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 2 views

It was conjectured in [Wang, to appear in The Australasian Journal of Combinatorics] that, for each integer k โ‰ฅ 2, there exists . This conjecture is also verified for k = 2, 3 in [Wang, to appear; Wang, manuscript]. In this article, we prove this conjecture to be true if n โ‰ฅ 3k, i.e., M (k) โ‰ค 3k. W