Proof of a conjecture on game domination
โ Scribed by O. Favaron; H. Karami; R. Khoeilar; S. M. Sheikholeslami; L. Volkmann
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2009
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 87 KB
- Volume
- 64
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0364-9024
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
โฆ Synopsis
Abstract
The game domination number of a (simple, undirected) graph is defined by the following game. Two players,
\documentclass{article}\usepackage{amssymb}\usepackage{amsbsy}\usepackage[mathscr]{euscript}\footskip=0pc\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}${\mathcal{A}}$\end{document} and
\documentclass{article}\usepackage{amssymb}\usepackage{amsbsy}\usepackage[mathscr]{euscript}\footskip=0pc\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}${\mathcal{D}}$\end{document}, orient the edges of the graph alternately until all edges are oriented. Player
\documentclass{article}\usepackage{amssymb}\usepackage{amsbsy}\usepackage[mathscr]{euscript}\footskip=0pc\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}${\mathcal{D}}$\end{document} starts the game, and his goal is to decrease the domination number of the resulting digraph, while
\documentclass{article}\usepackage{amssymb}\usepackage{amsbsy}\usepackage[mathscr]{euscript}\footskip=0pc\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}${\mathcal{A}}$\end{document} is trying to increase it. The game domination number of the graph G, denoted by ฮณ~g~(G), is the domination number of the directed graph resulting from this game. This is well defined if we suppose that both players follow their optimal strategies. Alon et al. (Discrete Math 256 (2002), 23โ33) conjectured that, if both G and \documentclass{article}\usepackage{amssymb}\usepackage{amsbsy}\usepackage[mathscr]{euscript}\footskip=0pc\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$\overline{G}$\end{document} are connected graphs with n vertices, then \documentclass{article}\usepackage{amssymb}\usepackage{amsbsy}\usepackage[mathscr]{euscript}\footskip=0pc\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$\gamma_{g}(G)+\gamma_{g}(\overline{G})\le\frac{2}{3}{n}+{3}$\end{document}. In this paper we prove that this conjecture is true for nโฉพ41. ยฉ 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Graph Theory 64: 323โ329, 2010
๐ SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Abstract Jacobson, Levin, and Scheinerman introduced the fractional Ramsey function __r__~__f__~ (__a__~1~, __a__~2~, โฆ, __a__~__k__~) as an extension of the classical definition for Ramsey numbers. They determined an exact formula for the fractional Ramsey function for the case __k__=2. In this
## Abstract Let __ir__(__G__) and ฮณ(__G__) be the irredundance number and the domination number of a graph __G__, respectively. A graph __G__ is called __irredundance perfect__ if __ir__(__H__)=ฮณ(__H__), for every induced subgraph __H__ of __G__. In this article we present a result which immediatel
Let P(G, \*) denote the chromatic polynomial of a graph G. It is proved in this paper that for every connected graph G of order n and real number \* n, (\*&2) n&1 P(G, \*)&\*(\*&1) n&2 P(G, \*&1) 0. By this result, the following conjecture proposed by Bartels and Welsh is proved: P(G, n)(P(G, n&1))
It was conjectured in [Wang, to appear in The Australasian Journal of Combinatorics] that, for each integer k โฅ 2, there exists . This conjecture is also verified for k = 2, 3 in [Wang, to appear; Wang, manuscript]. In this article, we prove this conjecture to be true if n โฅ 3k, i.e., M (k) โค 3k. W