Credible and useful methodologic evaluations are essential for increasing the uptake of effective cancer screening tests. In the current article, the authors discuss selected issues that are related to conducting behavior change interventions in cancer screening research and that may assist research
Promoting cancer screening: Learning from experience
โ Scribed by Helen I. Meissner; Robert A. Smith; Barbara K. Rimer; Katherine M. Wilson; William Rakowski; Sally W. Vernon; Peter A. Briss
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2004
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 150 KB
- Volume
- 101
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0008-543X
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
โฆ Synopsis
The authors thank Stephen Taplin, M.D., for his thoughtful comments and acknowledge his suggestions for improving this article.
๐ SIMILAR VOLUMES
The authors thank William Rakowski and Sarah Fox for their thoughtful comments and Manasa Reddy and Damon Johnson for their assistance in the preparation of the current article.
The city is at war, and Kurt is in the middle of it.After defeating the evil Tandi, her empire is up for grabs, and supernatural forces will surge into the city to fill the power vacuum. With help from his women, his bartender, and his librarian, Kurt will begin unraveling an ancient mystery about w
The authors draw on the lessons highlighted in preceding articles in the current supplement to provide recommendations for cancer screening intervention research and to highlight some of the many questions that will require further investigation.
Cost-effectiveness analyses (CEAs) can help to quantify the contribution of the promotion of a screening program to increased participation in screening. The cost-effectiveness (C/E) of screening promotion depends in large part on the endpoints of interest. At the most fundamental level, the C/E of