The future of research that promotes cancer screening
โ Scribed by Helen I. Meissner; Sally W. Vernon; Barbara K. Rimer; Katherine M. Wilson; William Rakowski; Peter A. Briss; Robert A. Smith
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2004
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 106 KB
- Volume
- 101
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0008-543X
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
โฆ Synopsis
The authors draw on the lessons highlighted in preceding articles in the current supplement to provide recommendations for cancer screening intervention research and to highlight some of the many questions that will require further investigation.
๐ SIMILAR VOLUMES
Cost-effectiveness analyses (CEAs) can help to quantify the contribution of the promotion of a screening program to increased participation in screening. The cost-effectiveness (C/E) of screening promotion depends in large part on the endpoints of interest. At the most fundamental level, the C/E of
## Background: Although strong scientific evidence has shown that screening for colorectal cancer saves lives, most u.s. adults who are at the recommended age are not being screened. prior studies suggest that barriers to routine screening vary by race, ethnicity, socioeconomic status, urban/rural
## Communicated by Richard Wooster The vast amount of information emerging from cancer research in recent years has presented a challenge for researchers worldwide. The opportunities for using this data to enhance understanding of the disease and advance the delivery of novel anticancer treatments