In discussions of terrorism one would expect to encounter a significant division between consequentialists on the one hand and deontologists on the other. One would expect to find consequentialists arguing that terrorism could be justified if, on balance, it advanced the cause of the good over alter
PROGRESSIVE CONSEQUENTIALISM
โ Scribed by Dale Jamieson; Robert Elliot
- Book ID
- 109061474
- Publisher
- Blackwell Publishing
- Year
- 2009
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 89 KB
- Volume
- 23
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 1758-2245
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
๐ SIMILAR VOLUMES
There was a time JoAnn felt Jim was attracted to her, before he met Lexie, but Lexie broke his heart and married someone else. Was there the least bit of chance, JoAnn pondered wistfully, that she might replace his lost love and capture and mend his broken heart? The way to his heart was clear. But
One of the more basic distinctions usually drawn in metaethics is between formalist (deontological) and consequentialist (teleological) systems of moral reasoning. Andrew Oldenquist has recently argued that there is no difference between these two types of system, and that each is therefore trivial.