๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

PROGRESSIVE CONSEQUENTIALISM

โœ Scribed by Dale Jamieson; Robert Elliot


Book ID
109061474
Publisher
Blackwell Publishing
Year
2009
Tongue
English
Weight
89 KB
Volume
23
Category
Article
ISSN
1758-2245

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Terrorism and consequentialism
โœ Burleigh T. Wilkins ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1987 ๐Ÿ› Springer ๐ŸŒ English โš– 605 KB

In discussions of terrorism one would expect to encounter a significant division between consequentialists on the one hand and deontologists on the other. One would expect to find consequentialists arguing that terrorism could be justified if, on balance, it advanced the cause of the good over alter

Consequentialism and Commitment
โœ Alastair Norcross ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1997 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 98 KB
cover
โœ Freda, Paula ๐Ÿ“‚ Fiction ๐Ÿ› Paula Freda ๐ŸŒ English โš– 38 KB

There was a time JoAnn felt Jim was attracted to her, before he met Lexie, but Lexie broke his heart and married someone else. Was there the least bit of chance, JoAnn pondered wistfully, that she might replace his lost love and capture and mend his broken heart? The way to his heart was clear. But

Dual-ranking act-consequentialism
โœ Douglas W. Portmore ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2007 ๐Ÿ› Springer Netherlands ๐ŸŒ English โš– 260 KB
The formalism-consequentialism distincti
โœ Michael D. Smith ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1978 ๐Ÿ› Springer Netherlands ๐ŸŒ English โš– 311 KB

One of the more basic distinctions usually drawn in metaethics is between formalist (deontological) and consequentialist (teleological) systems of moral reasoning. Andrew Oldenquist has recently argued that there is no difference between these two types of system, and that each is therefore trivial.