## BACKGROUND. In most reported surgical series, prostate carcinoma patients with a Gleason score of 7 have had worse outcomes than those with other moderately differentiated cancers. Because of variations in reporting grade and grouping Gleason scores, radiation series have conflicting results.
Prognostic significance of Gleason pattern in patients with Gleason score 7 prostate carcinoma
β Scribed by Kris K. Rasiah; Phillip D. Stricker; Anne-Maree Haynes; Warick Delprado; Jennifer J. Turner; David Golovsky; Phillip C. Brenner; Raji Kooner; Gordon F. O'Neill; John J. Grygiel; Robert L. Sutherland; Susan M. Henshall
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2003
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 85 KB
- Volume
- 98
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0008-543X
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
Abstract
BACKGROUND
In the current study, the authors sought to further stratify the prognosis of patients with Gleason score (GS) 7 prostate carcinoma. They assessed the influence on outcome of a predominant poorly differentiated Gleason pattern (primary Gleason pattern [GP] 4) and/or a coincident small focus of poorly differentiated tumor of higher grade (tertiary GP 5).
METHODS
The authors studied 412 patients (mean postoperative followβup, 33 months) with GS 7 tumors treated with radical prostatectomy at a single Australian campus between November 1989 and December 2002. The chiβsquare test, KaplanβMeier method, and Cox proportional hazards analyses were used to evaluate the correlation between primary GP 4 and tertiary GP 5 with the occurrence of adverse pathologic features and disease recurrence.
RESULTS
In this cohort, 307 patients (75%) had primary GP 3 tumors, 105 (25%) had primary GP 4 tumors, and 17 (2.3%) had a tertiary element of highβgrade tumor (GP 5). Patients with primary GP 4 tumors displayed higher rates of seminal vesicle involvement and extraprostatic extension and, along with patients with tertiary GP 5, had significantly shorter times to disease recurrence. Univariate analysis demonstrated that primary GP 4 (P = 0.0003) and tertiary GP 5 (P < 0.0001) were strong predictors of disease recurrence. Primary GP 4 (P = 0.0122) remained an independent predictor of disease recurrence on stepwise multivariate analysis.
CONCLUSIONS
Primary GP 4 tumors represented an aggressive subset of GS 7 prostate carcinomas. Primary GP was an easily accessible and clinically relevant predictor of disease recurrence in patients with GS 7 prostate carcinoma. Cancer 2003;98:2560β5. Β© 2003 American Cancer Society.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
## BACKGROUND. The routine use of serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing combined with digital rectal examination has lowered tumor volume and clinical-pathological stage of men undergoing radical prostatectomy. Therefore, we may identify more men with poorly differentiated tumors of early
## BACKGROUND. Early (Υ 2 years) prostate specific antigen (PSA) failure after radical prostatectomy (RP) has been shown to predict for distant failure. After excluding patients with the pathologic predictors of early PSA failure, an analysis of PSA failure free (bNED) survival was performed to ide
AKT/PKB is a central signaling molecule related to stimulation of cell proliferation and inhibition of apoptosis. Perturbations of AKT expression and function play an important role in tumor development and progression. We wanted to determine (a) whether AKT is overexpressed in human prostatic tumor