Prognostic significance of dna-ploidy in a series of 690 primary breast cancer patients
โ Scribed by H. Beerman; Ph. M. Kluin; J. Hermans; C. J. H. Van de Velde; C. J. Cornelisse
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 1990
- Tongue
- French
- Weight
- 650 KB
- Volume
- 45
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0020-7136
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
โฆ Synopsis
Flow cytometric DNA-ploidy measurements were performed on paraffin-embedded and fresh tumor specimens from 690 patients with Stage 1-111 breast cancer. The conventional classification of DNA-ploidy (diploid versus aneuploid) was compared with a division of tumor ploidy into 5 classes based on DNA index (DI) range. The DI-classification showed a better correlation with tumor size and TNM stage than the conventional classification. Aneuploidy was associated with an impaired survival and distant relapse-free survival (p = 0.02) but the DI-classification improved the discrimination between different prognostic groups of patients. In general, this indicated a more aggressive phenotype for tumors evolved via polyploidization. Hyper-tetraploidy (DI > 2.10) indicated a very poor prognosis in pre-menopausal patients. No prognostic effect of aneuploidy and DI-class was found in node-negative and TI patients. Cox multivariate regression analysis showed that aneuploidy was an additional prognostic factor to nodal status (I S N S 3, N > 3 vs. N = 0) and tumor size (T2-4 vs. TI) for overall and distant relapse-free survival. Subdivision according to DI-class did not improve the prognostic power of DNA-ploidy due to stronger correlations with established prognostic factors.
๐ SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Background: Dna aneuploidy has been prognostically significant in female breast carcinoma of low stage, but its value in male breast carcinoma remains undetermined. ## Methods: Flow cytometric dna analyses were performed retrospectively on paraffin-embedded tissue from 32 men with breast carci
In this prospective study, the independent prognostic value of DNA ploidy in combination with the major clinico-pathological characteristics (histological grade, nodal status, tumor size, estrogen and progesterone receptor status, number of tumors, multicentricity, lympho-vascular infiltration) was