Prescription practices of diagnostic imaging in dementia: a survey of 47 Alzheimer's Centres in Northern Italy
β Scribed by R. Riello; C. Albini; S. Galluzzi; P. Pasqualetti; G. B. Frisoni
- Book ID
- 102232592
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2003
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 112 KB
- Volume
- 18
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0885-6230
- DOI
- 10.1002/gps.893
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
Abstract
Background
To date, there are no data at the national or European level on the prescription practices of imaging (CT, MR, and SPET) in the diagnosis of cognitively impaired elderly patients.
Methods
We addressed prescription practices of diagnostic imaging in 47 Alzheimer's Centres in Northern Italy, with an adβhoc questionnaire.
Results
The use of imaging in new cases was relatively intensive: 62% of the Alzheimer's Centres prescribed CT to more than 95% of cases, 24% prescribed MR to more than 33% of cases, and 33% prescribed SPET to more than 5% of cases. A minority of Alzheimer's Centres (nβ=β3, 6%) prescribed imaging to less than 100% of new cases. The association between onsite scanner availability and frequency of prescription increased from CT (Odds ratio (OR)β=β1.8) through MR (ORβ=β2.4) to SPET (ORβ=β4.6), although only the latter was significant (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.2β17.7, pβ=β0.003). Patientβrelated factors (age, severity of cognitive impairment, and clinical suspicion of cerebrovascular disease) influenced prescription of structural imaging in 30β53% of Alzheimer's Centres and organizational factors (onsite scanner availability, and waiting list) in a similar proportion (32 and 43% respectively).
Conclusions
Organizational factors play a relevant role in the prescription of imaging exams in patients with cognitive impairment and, at least for CT, the perceived diagnostic added value is rather low, suggesting a high degree of uncertainty in the clinical use of imaging techniques. Copyright Β© 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Aims To ensure that all Alzheimer centres across Europe are capable of using a similar method of data collection. Information about the patient assessment tools used by each participating centre was obtained and normal clinical practice in each EADC centre was documented by collecting data from