The work of the Commission was greatly aided by significant contributions from P. Burns, J. Cooper, J.D. Harrison, and W. Weiss. It also benefited from discussions at many international meetings on the present Recommendations. The Commission wishes to express its appreciation to all international a
Preface, Executive Summary and Glossary
β Scribed by ICRP
- Publisher
- Elsevier Science
- Year
- 2009
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 88 KB
- Volume
- 39
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0146-6453
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
This report provides a summary of the methods and procedures used to create the computational phantoms corresponding to the adult Reference Male and Reference Female from individual-specific tomographic data. The methods and procedures used in this activity have been reported in numerous publications. These phantoms are designed specifically for calculation of the radiological protection quantities corresponding to the effective dose concept of the 2007 Recommendations of the Commission. The phantoms are presented to the radiation protection community in numerical format, with identification of source and target regions of the body in the CD inserted at the back cover of this publication. Due to the numerical nature of the phantoms and earlier publication of the characteristics of the adult Reference Male and Reference Female, this document was not provided for public consultation. The authors acknowledge the comments received from the ICRP Committees, the International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements (ICRU), and selected expert reviewers.
Although being released as an ICRP publication, the present report is a joint publication of ICRP and ICRU.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
This report aims to serve the purposes described above. In order to be as useful as possible for those purposes, its style differs in a few respects from the usual style of the CommissionΓs publications in the Annals of the ICRP. The report was approved for publication by the Commission in October
environment administered by the states with minimal federal oversight. The managed care environment is changing rapidly as evidenced in the way alliances are developed, contracts are negotiated and how care is given. Employers want to keep costs down, and contracts are negotiated with providers for