Predictors of the cost of liver transplantation
β Scribed by Brown, Robert S. ;Lake, John R. ;Ascher, Nancy L. ;Emond, Jean C. ;Roberts, John P.
- Publisher
- Wiley (John Wiley & Sons)
- Year
- 1998
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 105 KB
- Volume
- 4
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 1074-3022
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
Background:
Orthotopic liver transplantation (olt) is a highly effective but costly therapy for end-stage liver disease. however, there are limited data on the demographic and clinical variables that affect cost. we undertook a preliminary study using multiple regression techniques to analyze factors that influence the cost of olt.
Methods:
Patient and demographic data, including laboratory values and charges for all liver transplantations performed between june 1992 and june 1993 were analyzed (n = 111). linear regression with standard and log-transformed values was performed by using stata software (stata corporation college station, tx). independent variables included in the analyses were age, sex, united network for organ sharing (unos) status, primary versus retransplantation, liver-kidney transplantation, and laboratory parameters of both liver (aspartate aminotransferase, ast; alkaline phosphatase; bilirubin; albumin; and prothrombin time) and kidney (blood urea nitrogen, bun; creatinine) function. an f-to-remove strategy was employed with a significance level set at p = .05.
Results:
The full model with 12 variables explained 37% of the total variation in charges. when one excludes variables that did not have a significant impact on cost, the remaining significant variables were bun and unos status 1. the final model was charges (us$) = 3,407 x bun + 74,474 x status 1 + 102,662. this model accounted for 29% of the total variability with bun accounting for the vast majority (26%).
Conclusions:
Renal function is the most important predictor of cost of olt (p < .001). unos status 1 further increases cost, but other hospitalized patients have similar costs when one controls for other clinical variables. the degree of liver impairment is less important in predicting cost.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
A randomized controlled study of propranolol for prevention of recurrent gastrointestinal bleeding in patients with cirrhosis: a final report. Hepatology 1984; 9. Valla D, Bercoff E, Manu Y, et al. Discrepancy between wedged hepatic venous pressure and portal venous pressure after acute propranolol
Background. An important long-term consideration for living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT) is the expense compared with cadaveric-liver transplantation. LDLT is a more complex procedure than cadaveric transplantation and the cost of donor evaluation, donor surgery, and postoperative donor care m
The Model for End-Stage Liver Disease system has given priority on the liver transplant waiting list to candidates with renal failure. This study determined the predictors of spontaneous recovery of renal function after transplantation in 1041 liver transplant recipients on renal replacement therapy
Accurate assessment of the impact of donor quality on liver transplant (LT) costs has been limited by the lack of a large, multicenter study of detailed clinical and economic data. A novel, retrospective database linking information from the University HealthSystem Consortium and the Organ Procureme
The resources that are directed towards the care of liver transplant recipients are substantial. Approximately 100 million dollars are spent on the hospitalization of the 400 -500 children in the United States who undergo liver transplantation each year. Using length of stay as a surrogate marker fo