𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

The interaction among donor characteristics, severity of liver disease, and the cost of liver transplantation

✍ Scribed by Paolo R. Salvalaggio; Nino Dzebisashvili; Kara E. MacLeod; Krista L. Lentine; Adrian Gheorghian; Mark A. Schnitzler; Samuel Hohmann; Dorry L. Segev; Sommer E. Gentry; David A. Axelrod


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2011
Tongue
English
Weight
209 KB
Volume
17
Category
Article
ISSN
1527-6465

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Accurate assessment of the impact of donor quality on liver transplant (LT) costs has been limited by the lack of a large, multicenter study of detailed clinical and economic data. A novel, retrospective database linking information from the University HealthSystem Consortium and the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network registry was analyzed using multivariate regression to determine the relationship between donor quality (assessed through the Donor Risk Index [DRI]), recipient illness severity, and total inpatient costs (transplant and all readmissions) for 1 year following LT. Cost data were available for 9059 LT recipients. Increasing MELD score, higher DRI, simultaneous liver-kidney transplant, female sex, and prior liver transplant were associated with increasing cost of LT (P < 0.05). MELD and DRI interact to synergistically increase the cost of LT (P < 0.05). Donors in the highest DRI quartile added close to $12,000 to the cost of transplantation and nearly $22,000 to posttransplant costs in comparison to the lowest risk donors. Among the individual components of the DRI, donation after cardiac death (increased costs by $20,769 versus brain dead donors) had the greatest impact on transplant costs. Overall, 1-year costs were increased in older donors, minority donors, nationally shared organs, and those with cold ischemic times of 7-13 hours (P < 0.05 for all). In conclusion, donor quality, as measured by the DRI, is an independent predictor of LT costs in the perioperative and postoperative periods. Centers in highly competitive regions that perform transplantation on higher MELD patients with high DRI livers may be particularly affected by the synergistic impact of these factors.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Is the Cost of Adult Living Donor Liver
✍ Mark W. Russo; Robert S. Brown Jr. πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2004 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 56 KB πŸ‘ 2 views

Background. An important long-term consideration for living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT) is the expense compared with cadaveric-liver transplantation. LDLT is a more complex procedure than cadaveric transplantation and the cost of donor evaluation, donor surgery, and postoperative donor care m

Use of living donor liver transplantatio
✍ Parsia A. Vagefi; Nancy L. Ascher; Chris E. Freise; Jennifer L. Dodge; John P. R πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2012 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 193 KB πŸ‘ 1 views

The demographics of patients in the United States who undergo living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) versus patients who undergo deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT) are interesting with respect to the demographics of the donor service areas (DSAs). We examined adult recipients of primary,

Outcomes of living donor liver transplan
✍ Jeffrey Campsen; Andres T. Blei; Jean C. Emond; James E. Everhart; Chris E. Frei πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2008 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 113 KB πŸ‘ 1 views

For acute liver failure (ALF), living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) may reduce waiting time and provide better timing compared to deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT). However, there are concerns that a partial graft would result in reduced survival of critically ill LDLT recipients and

Selection of liver-transplant candidates
✍ Noriyo Yamashiki; Yasuhiko Sugawara; Sumihito Tamura; Junichi Kaneko; Kayo Nojir πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2006 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 131 KB πŸ‘ 1 views

The selection of living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) recipients in regions where deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT) is rarely performed might be different from that in other centers at which LDLT is an alternative option to DDLT. Records of adult (age > or = 18 yr) patients referred t