𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Prediction of prognosis in axillary lymph node positive breast cancer patients: A statistical study

✍ Scribed by Dr. B. O. Mæhle; R. Skjærven


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
1984
Tongue
English
Weight
438 KB
Volume
71
Category
Article
ISSN
0007-1323

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Abstract
This work has identified variables of importance to short- and long-term prognosis in 97 node positive breast cancer patients followed for a minimum of 98 months. The diameter of the primary tumour (⩽3 cm/>3 cm) is shown to be an important prognostic variable. Its addition to the presence/absence of tumour cells in the efferent nodal vessels and the mean nuclear area of the tumour cells gave correct prediction of the disease outcome, 60 and 98 months after the operation, in 83 and 80 per cent of the patients respectively. Although the number of tumour-bearing nodes is shown to be a strong variable, more information was gained from the tumour diameter. Histological grade was only of value for 5-year prognosis. Factors that did not add information of prognostic value in these circumstances were identified. The proposed models demonstrate the great heterogeneity within this group of patients.


📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES


Lymph node imprint cytology for the rapi
✍ D. S. Quill; A. L. Leahy; R. G. Lawler; R. D. Finney 📂 Article 📅 1984 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 173 KB 👁 1 views

## Lymph node imprint cytology for the rapid assessment of axillary node metastases in breast cancer Lymph node imprint cytology was performed on 86 nodes from 13 consecutive patients with breast cancer undergoing simple mastectomy with axillary node sampling, and a prospective comparison with par

Correlation of tumor size and axillary l
✍ Anthony L. Abner; Laura Collins; Gloria Peiro; Abram Recht; Steven Come; Lawrenc 📂 Article 📅 1998 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 84 KB 👁 2 views

## BACKGROUND. The prognosis of patients with T1 breast carcinoma remains controversial. Some studies have shown a low risk of lymph node metastasis and distant failure whereas others have not, possibly due to differences in the definition of tumor size. In this study, the authors assessed the rel