## Abstract Thirty replicates of 200 nuclear families (6 members each) were generated under three GxE interaction models. Segregation analyses of these data were performed using a regressive model taking into account an interaction effect or not. Results showed that ignoring the GxE interaction mar
Power of segregation analysis for detection of major gene effects on quantitative traits
โ Scribed by I. B. Borecki; M. A. Province; D. C. Rao
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 1994
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 584 KB
- Volume
- 11
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0741-0395
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
โฆ Synopsis
The power to detect major gene effects by rejection of the "no major gene" null hypothesis against a mixed model alternative was determined in random samples of nuclear families over a variety of conditions. Benchmarks have been developed using a varying number of families whose structure includes both parents and three children. Phenotypes were simulated assuming a Mendelian major gene under either recessive or dominant inheritance, with 0-30% residual polygenic heritability. Three trait prevalences-5, 10, and 20%-were considered in combination with increasing displacement between homozygous means, spanning a range of 14 to 36% of the phenotypic variance attributable to the major gene effect. All other assumptions of the traditional mixed model were adopted in the generating models. Segregation analysis was carried out on the simulated data sets, and the proportion of samples out of 200 replications in which the null hypothesis q = 0 was rejected is reported as the power. Thus, failure to detect a major gene effect in this context is solely due to sampling variation, since no other perturbations were introduced. In general, there appears to be greater power to detect dominant major gene effects as opposed to recessive ones using otherwise comparable parameter values, and the effect of varying sibship size under dominant models appears to be greater as well. The use of joint vs. conditional likelihood calculations also was evaluated; substantial drops in power were observed when using conditional likelihoods under recessive inheritance, while the differences in power appeared to be nominal under dominant inheritance. The results of this investigation are offered as a guide to assist in the design of family studies whose aim is to detect major gene effects.
๐ SIMILAR VOLUMES
Segregation analysis using a model with age and gender effects was applied to 101 pedigrees ascertained through a proband with idiopathic scoliosis. The transmission probability model was used to detect major gene effect. When we analyzed the pedigrees where affected status was assigned to persons w
## Abstract Linkage analysis has been one of the most widely used methods for identifying regions of the human genome which contain genes responsible for human diseases. Evidence suggests that the effects of some of the trait causing genes may vary with the age of an individual, giving rise to temp
Using the Problem 2A data sets of GAW10, we assessed the power of four ascertainment schemes to localize major genes underlying a disease trait; the schemes were based on disease or quantitative trait status of nuclear families. MAPMAKER/SIBS was used to perform sib-pair analysis for all four data s
## Abstract Although extended pedigrees are often sampled through probands with extreme levels of a quantitative trait, Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) methods for segregation and linkage analysis have not been able to perform ascertainment corrections. Further, the extent to which ascertainment of