## Abstract Although the importance of selecting cases and controls from the same population has been recognized for decades, the recent advent of genome‐wide association studies has heightened awareness of this issue. Because these studies typically deal with large samples, small differences in al
Power consequences of linkage disequilibrium variation between populations
✍ Scribed by Yik Y. Teo; Kerrin S. Small; Andrew E. Fry; Yumeng Wu; Dominic P. Kwiatkowski; Taane G. Clark
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2009
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 245 KB
- Volume
- 33
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0741-0395
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Abstract
We quantify the degree to which LD differences exist in the human genome and investigates the consequences that variations in patterns of LD between populations can have on the power of case‐control or family‐trio association studies. Although only a small proportion of SNPs show significant LD differences (0.8–5%), these can introduce artificial signals of associations and reduce the power to detect true associations in case‐control designs, even when meta‐analytic approaches are used to account for stratification. We show that combining trios from different populations in the presence of significant LD differences can adversely affect power even though the number of trios has increased. Our results have implications on genetic studies conducted in populations with substantial population structure and show that the use of meta‐analytic approaches or family‐based designs to protect Type 1 error does not prevent loss of power due to differences in LD across populations. Genet. Epidemiol. 2008. © 2008 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Abstract The power of transmission/disequilibrium tests (TDTs) for detecting disease susceptibility loci is expected to be influenced by population admixture through its impact on the degree of linkage disequilibrium (LD) between the genetic marker and the DSL. However, few studies have been don
Contributions to Group 17 of the Genetic Analysis Workshop 15 considered dense markers in linkage disequilibrium (LD) in the context of either linkage or association analysis. Three contributions reported on methods for modeling LD or selecting a subset of markers in linkage equilibrium to perform l