The effects of illness and its treatment on quality of life have become important considerations in drug evaluation. Quality of life is difficult to define showing great individual variability. It is not the same as 'health'. It is concerned with the satisfaction of primary and secondary needs, sati
Poster Sessions: Care Delivery/Quality of Life
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2006
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 287 KB
- Volume
- 21
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0885-3185
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
โฆ Synopsis
Objective: Distinguish biomechanical from neurological gait influences in people with PD.
Background: Hypokinetic walking in PD has been described by comparison to unimpaired controls. Walking speed, a powerful influence on gait, has not been controlled in most studies. The rapid and reversible response of patients with PD to DBS provides a means to separate biomechanical from neurological effects on walking.
Methods: We tested 5 subjects with PD that demonstrated marked clinical improvement in hypokinesia following bilateral subthalamic nucleus DBS (3M,2F; mean age 62ฯฎ6.6 yrs; mean body mass 89.6 kgฯฎ28.7 kg, DBS ี6 mo prior). 4 of 5 subjects with PD were tested in the drug-off state after overnight withdrawal of anti-PD medication. 5 matched Control subjects (CTRL) provided comparison data. All subjects walked on a treadmill at 0.36 m/s; two 30s trials for each condition. Subjects with PD were tested with DBS ON, then the DBS turned off and testing repeated 30 min later (DBS OFF). CTRL subjects were tested twice with 30 mins between sessions. Temporospatial gait parameters and sagittal ankle kinematics were captured with a computerized reflective marker system. Data from the most symptomatic leg (PD) were compared to the dominant leg of the CTRL group using MANOVA with pฯฝ0.05 followed by post-hoc Wilk's Lambda.
Results:
PD DBS ON PD DBS OFF
CTRL Sess 1 CTRL Sess 2
Step Length (cm)* 24.6 (6.5) 22.2 (6.0) 33.9 (3.1) 36.1 (1.9) Cadence (steps/min)* 96.3 (36.1) 101.5 (24.3) 65.4 (4.5) 62.9 (5.8) Initial Dbl Support (%) 22.1 (3.1) 21.7 (3.2) 23.0 (1.0) 21.3 (0.7) Dorsiflx @ Initial Contact 2.7 (5.2) 4.9 (4.4) -0.6 (3.0) -1.4 (5.6)
Avg Dorsiflx @ Single Leg Stance 8.9 (4.0) 9.8 (4.7) 7.4 (2.9) 7.0 (3.2)
Avg Dorsiflx @ Early Swing -0.2 (7.0) -0.7 (7.6) 1.2 (4.3) -0.4 (6.4) Avg Trunk Rotation 3.8 (2.5) 2.6 (1.2) 2.4 (1.1) 2.6 (1.6) Base of Support (cm) 12.7 (3.7) 10.1 (2.1) 12.0 (3.1) 10.8 (3.4) Mean (sd) *ฯญsignificant difference Step Length: PD-vs-CTRL, pี 0.02, DBS ON-vs-DBS OFF, pฯญ0.04 Cadence: PD-vs-CTRL, pี 0.009 only for DBS OFF-Session 2 Conclusion: The few differences between PD and CTRL imply a dominant biomechanical influence on slow walking. Differences between PD and CTRL subjects and effects of DBS were present only in Step Length and Cadence. Comparative studies of PD hypokinesia must consider the effects of walking speed.
๐ SIMILAR VOLUMES
Objective. To evaluate variables associated with quality of life (QOL) in dementia residents in a long-term care facility using a recently standardized and validated dementia-speciยฎc QOL scale (ADRQL). Method. A cross-sectional, case-control design was employed using validated scales to assess deme
A stratified randomly selected sample of 28 of all elderly long-term care institutions in the Southampton district was studied including private and local authority residential homes, private nursing homes and NHS geriatric and psychogeriatric wards. The manager was interviewed with a 57-item qualit
## Abstract ## Background Quality of Life (QoL) is a key outcome in dementia. ## Aim To compare care recipients' (CR) and caregivers' (CG) views on CRs' QoL and identify determinants. ## Methods CRs and CGs completed the Quality of Life โ Alzheimer's Disease (QOLโAD) scale. ## Results One hu
Background Among older people, somatization has been reported to be common and to be predictive of high attendance in primary care. Its relationship with quality of life among older people has not been investigated. Objectives The objective was to establish whether, among older primary care attender
## Abstract ## BACKGROUND Quality indicators (QIs) are tools designed to measure and improve quality of care. The objective of this study was to assess stakeholder acceptability of QIs of endโofโlife (EOL) care that potentially were measurable from populationโbased administrative health databases.