✦ LIBER ✦

Poster 273 Validity and Reliability of the Pictorial Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale

✍ Scribed by Spyridon Papapetropoulos; Lee Ming Boo; Mitchell F. Brin; Cynthia Comella

Book ID: 119350408
Publisher: Wiley (John Wiley & Sons)
Year: 2011
Tongue: English
Weight: 47 KB
Volume: 3
Category: Article
ISSN: 1934-1482
DOI: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2011.08.300

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

The Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticolli

The Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale: Reliability in neurologists and physiotherapists

✍ Melani J. Boyce; Colleen G. Canning; Neil Mahant; John Morris; Jane Latimer; Vic 📂 Article 📅 2012 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 109 KB

Reliability and validity of the Wolfram

Reliability and validity of the Wolfram Unified Rating Scale (WURS)

✍ Chau Nguyen, Erin R Foster, Alexander R Paciorkowski, Amy Viehoever, Colleen Con 📂 Article 📅 2012 🏛 BioMed Central 🌐 English ⚖ 226 KB

Reliability and validity studies of the

Reliability and validity studies of the comprehensive psychopathological rating scale (CPRS)

✍ Perris, Carlo 📂 Article 📅 1979 🏛 Elsevier Science ⚖ 440 KB

Validity and reliability of the Childhoo

Validity and reliability of the Childhood Autism Rating Scale with autistic adolescents

✍ Deborah G. Garfin; Denise McCallon 📂 Article 📅 1988 🏛 Springer US 🌐 English ⚖ 580 KB

Factorial validity and reliability of th

Factorial validity and reliability of the Devereux Elementary School Behavior Rating Scale

✍ William M. Reynolds; Sydna M. Bernstein 📂 Article 📅 1982 🏛 Springer US 🌐 English ⚖ 492 KB

Portuguese version of the Delirium Ratin

Portuguese version of the Delirium Rating Scale-Revised-98: reliability and validity

✍ Daniel Philippi de Negreiros; Alexandrina Maria Augusto da Silva Meleiro; Letíci 📂 Article 📅 2008 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 95 KB 👁 1 views

## Abstract ## Objective To assess the validity and the reliability of the Portuguese version of the Delirium Rating Scale‐Revised‐98 (DRS‐R‐98). ## Methods The scale was translated into Portuguese and back‐translated into English. After assessing its face validity, five diagnostic groups (__n__