## Abstract ## Background Delirium is the most common acute neuropsychiatric disorder in hospitalized elderly. The Dutch version of the Delirium Rating Scale—Revised‐98 (DRS‐R‐98) appears to be a reliable method to classify delirium. The aim of this study was to determine the validity and reliabil
Portuguese version of the Delirium Rating Scale-Revised-98: reliability and validity
✍ Scribed by Daniel Philippi de Negreiros; Alexandrina Maria Augusto da Silva Meleiro; Letícia M. Furlanetto; Paula T. Trzepacz
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2008
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 95 KB
- Volume
- 23
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0885-6230
- DOI
- 10.1002/gps.1906
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Abstract
Objective
To assess the validity and the reliability of the Portuguese version of the Delirium Rating Scale‐Revised‐98 (DRS‐R‐98).
Methods
The scale was translated into Portuguese and back‐translated into English. After assessing its face validity, five diagnostic groups (n = 64; delirium, depression, dementia, schizophrenia and others) were evaluated by two independent researchers blinded to the diagnosis. Diagnosis and severity of delirium as measured by the DRS‐R‐98 were compared to clinical diagnosis, Mini‐Mental State Exam, Confusion Assessment Method, and Clinical Global Impressions scale (CGI).
Results
Mean and median DRS‐R‐98 total scores significantly distinguished delirium from the other groups (p < 0.001). Inter‐rater reliability (ICC between 0.9 and 1) and internal consistency (α = 0.91) were very high. DRS‐R‐98 severity scores correlated highly with the CGI. Mean DRS‐R‐98 severity scores during delirium differed significantly (p < 0.01) from the post‐treatment values. The area under the curve established by ROC analysis was 0.99 and using the cut‐off value of 20 the scale showed sensitivity and specificity of 92.6% and 94.6%, respectively.
Conclusion
The Portuguese version of the DRS‐R‐98 is a valid and reliable measure of delirium that distinguishes delirium from other disorders and is sensitive to change in delirium severity, which may be of great value for longitudinal studies. Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Objective: To prospectively evaluate the reliability and validity of the collateral source geriatric depression scale (cs-gds) administered by telephone (t-cs-gds) in patients undergoing outpatient comprehensive geriatric assessment. ## Subjects: Eighty-three geriatric patients evaluated in a
This study reports normative data of depressive mood in Brazil, using a Portuguese version of the Depression Adjective Check Lists (DACL; Lubin, 1981, in press). Participants (N = 1,063) were college students drawn from randomly selected courses in 10 Brazilian universities. Cross-cultural compariso
## Abstract This study presents the results of a training course on using the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) for the assessment of mental status. The agreements between ratings produced by 418 physicians (psychiatrists) were evaluated and compared with standard ratings. In this way it