𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Delirium subtype identification and the validation of the Delirium Rating Scale—Revised-98 (Dutch version) in hospitalized elderly patients

✍ Scribed by Sophia E. de Rooij; Barbara C. van Munster; Johanna C. Korevaar; Gerty Casteelen; Marieke J. Schuurmans; Roos C. van der Mast; Marcel Levi


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2006
Tongue
English
Weight
83 KB
Volume
21
Category
Article
ISSN
0885-6230

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Abstract

Background

Delirium is the most common acute neuropsychiatric disorder in hospitalized elderly. The Dutch version of the Delirium Rating Scale—Revised‐98 (DRS‐R‐98) appears to be a reliable method to classify delirium. The aim of this study was to determine the validity and reliability of the DRS‐R‐98 and to study clinical subtypes of delirium using the DRS‐R‐98.

Methods

Patients received the Dutch version of the DRS‐R‐98, the Mini‐Mental State Examination, the Confusion Assessment Method, and a clinical diagnosis of delirium according to DSM‐IV criteria, and their relatives the Informant Questionnaire Cognitive Decline in the Elderly.

Results

The DRS‐R‐98 validation cohort (n = 65) consisted of 23 patients with delirium, 22 patients with dementia, and 20 non‐psychiatric comparison patients. For the delirium subtype study, a second cohort comprising 54 delirious patients was investigated. Median DRS‐R‐98 scores significantly distinguished delirium from dementia and no psychiatric disorder. Inter‐rater reliability (intra‐class correlation 0.97) and internal consistency (Crohnbach's alpha 0.94) were high. Positive scores of DRS‐R‐98 item 4 (affect liability) and item 7 (motor agitation) predicted the presence of non‐hypoactive delirium, with a specificity of 89% and a sensitivity of 57%.

Conclusion

The results show that the Dutch version of the DRS‐R‐98 is a valid and reliable measure of delirium severity and distinguishes patients with delirium from patients with dementia and comparison patients. Furthermore, the DRS‐R‐98 is able to exclude hypoactive delirium. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.


📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES


Portuguese version of the Delirium Ratin
✍ Daniel Philippi de Negreiros; Alexandrina Maria Augusto da Silva Meleiro; Letíci 📂 Article 📅 2008 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 95 KB 👁 1 views

## Abstract ## Objective To assess the validity and the reliability of the Portuguese version of the Delirium Rating Scale‐Revised‐98 (DRS‐R‐98). ## Methods The scale was translated into Portuguese and back‐translated into English. After assessing its face validity, five diagnostic groups (__n__

AGGRESSIVE BEHAVIOUR IN THE CHINESE ELDE
✍ LINDA C. W. LAM; HELEN F. K. CHUI; JANNA NG 📂 Article 📅 1997 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 86 KB 👁 2 views

## Objective: The objective is to examine the validity of the chinese version of the rating scale for aggressive behaviour in the elderly (rage) in hong kong. ## Design: A cross-sectional study comparing the pattern of aggressive behaviour among residents of different elderly institutions. ## Se