𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

pKa predictions with a coupled finite difference Poisson–Boltzmann and Debye–Hückel method

✍ Scribed by Jim Warwicker


Book ID
105358273
Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2011
Tongue
English
Weight
385 KB
Volume
79
Category
Article
ISSN
0887-3585

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Abstract

Modeling charge interactions is important for understanding many aspects of biological structure and function, and continuum methods such as Finite Difference Poisson–Boltzmann (FDPB) are commonly employed. Calculations of pH‐dependence have identified separate populations; surface groups that can be modeled with a simple Debye–Hückel (DH) model, and buried groups, with stronger resultant interactions that are dependent on detailed conformation. This observation led to the development of a combined FDPB and DH method for p__K__~a~ prediction (termed FD/DH). This study reports application of this method to ionizable groups, including engineered buried charges, in staphylococcal nuclease. The data had been made available to interested research groups before publication of mutant structures and/or p__K__~a~ values. Overall, FD/DH calculations perform as intended with low Δp__K__~a~ values for surface groups (RMSD between predicted and experimental p__K__~a~ values of 0.74), and much larger Δp__K__~a~ values for the engineered internal groups, with RMSD = 1.64, where mutant structures were known and RMSD = 1.80, where they were modeled. The weaker resultant interactions of the surface groups are determined mostly by charge–charge interactions. For the buried groups, R^2^ for correlation between predicted and measured Δp__K__~a~ values is 0.74, despite the high RMSDs. Charge–charge interactions are much less important, with the R^2^ value for buried group Δp__K__~a~ values increasing to 0.80 when the term describing charge desolvation alone is used. Engineered charge burial delivers a relatively uniform, nonspecific effect, in terms of p__K__~a~. How the protein environment adapts in atomic detail to deliver this resultant effect is still an open question. Proteins 2011; © 2011 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.


📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES


An improved pairwise decomposable finite
✍ Christina L. Vizcarra; Naigong Zhang; Shannon A. Marshall; Ned S. Wingreen; Chen 📂 Article 📅 2008 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 520 KB

## Abstract Our goal is to develop accurate electrostatic models that can be implemented in current computational protein design protocols. To this end, we improve upon a previously reported pairwise decomposable, finite difference Poisson–Boltzmann (FDPB) model for protein design (Marshall et al.,

Implementation and testing of stable, fa
✍ Ninad V. Prabhu; Peijuan Zhu; Kim A. Sharp 📂 Article 📅 2004 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 609 KB

## Abstract A fast stable finite difference Poisson–Boltzmann (FDPB) model for implicit solvation in molecular dynamics simulations was developed using the smooth permittivity FDPB method implemented in the OpenEye ZAP libraries. This was interfaced with two widely used molecular dynamics packages,