𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Phosphorylation of the oncogenic transcription factor interferon regulatory factor 2 (IRF2) in vitro and in vivo

✍ Scribed by M.J. Birnbaum; B. van Zundert; P.S. Vaughan; A.J. Whitmarsh; A.J. van Wijnen; R.J. Davis; G.S. Stein; J.L. Stein


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
1997
Tongue
English
Weight
147 KB
Volume
66
Category
Article
ISSN
0730-2312

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


IRF2 is a transcription factor, possessing oncogenic potential, responsible for both the repression of growth-inhibiting genes (interferon) and the activation of cell cycle-regulated genes (histone H4). Surprisingly little is known about the post-translational modification of this factor. In this study, we analyze the phosphorylation of IRF2 both in vivo and in vitro. Immunoprecipitation of HA-tagged IRF2 expressed in 32 P-phosphate labelled COS-7 cells demonstrates that IRF2 is phosphorylated in vivo. Amino acid sequence analysis reveals that several potential phosphorylation sites exist for a variety of serine/threonine protein kinases, including those of the mitogen activated protein (MAP) kinase family. Using a battery of these protein kinases we show that recombinant IRF2 is a substrate for protein kinase A (PKA), protein kinase C (PKC), and casein kinase II (CK2) in vitro. However, other serine/threonine protein kinases, including the MAP kinases JNK1, p38, and ERK2, do not phosphorylate IRF2. Two-dimensional phosphopeptide mapping of the sites phosphorylated by PKA, PKC, and CKII in vitro demonstrates that these enzymes are capable of phosphorylating IRF2 at multiple distinct sites. Phosphoaminoacid analysis of HA-tagged IRF2 immunoprecipitated from an asynchronous population of proliferating, metabolically phosphate-labelled cells indicates that this protein is phosphorylated exclusively upon serine residues in vivo. These results suggest that the oncogenic protein IRF2 may be regulated via multiple pathways during cellular growth.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Intratumoral interferon regulatory facto
✍ Alain G. Zeimet; Daniel Reimer; Dominik Wolf; Heidi Fiegl; Nicole Concin; Annema πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2009 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 French βš– 345 KB

## Abstract IRF‐1 and IRF‐2 expression was determined by real‐time PCR in 138 ovarian cancer samples and 30 healthy ovarian biopsies and was correlated with the expression of other relevant immunologic parameters and common clinicopathologic variables. Regulation of IRF‐1 and IRF‐2 was evaluated by

Induction of transcription factor interf
✍ Kouki Mori; Scott Stone; Lalita Khaodhiar; Lewis E. Braverman; William J. DeVito πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1999 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 186 KB πŸ‘ 1 views

While it is well known that interferon-β₯ (IFNβ₯) and tumor necrosis factor-␣ (TNF␣) play a role in the regulation of thyroid growth and differentiated functions, the cellular and molecular mechanisms involved in mediating the effects of IFNβ₯ and TNF␣ on thyroid function are unknown. In the present st

The transcription factor KLF11 can induc
✍ David W. Emery; Georgios Gavriilidis; Haruhiko Asano; George Stamatoyannopoulos πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2007 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 254 KB

## Abstract Previous studies in a fetal erythroid cell line demonstrated that the transcription factor, KrΓΌppel‐like factor 11 (KLF11), could specifically induce transcription from a γ‐globin gene promoter, and that this induction was mediated through a specific canonical CACCC __cis__‐DNA binding