Philoponus has been identified as the founder in dynamics of the theory of impetus, an inner force impressed from without, which, in its later recurrence, has been hailed as a scientific revolution. His commentary is translated here without the previously translated excursus, the<i>Corollary</i><i>o
Philoponus: On Aristotle Physics 4.6-9
β Scribed by Pamela Huby
- Publisher
- Bloomsbury Academic
- Year
- 2012
- Tongue
- English
- Leaves
- 139
- Series
- Ancient Commentators on Aristotle
- Category
- Library
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
Philoponus has been identified as the founder in dynamics of the theory of impetus, an inner force impressed from without, which, in its later recurrence, has been hailed as a scientific revolution. His commentary is translated here without the previously translated excursus, the Corollary on Void, previously translated in the series. Philoponus rejects Aristotle's attack on the very idea of void and of the possibility of motion in it, even though he thinks that void never occurs in fact. Philoponus' arguement was later to be praised by Galileo.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
<p>Philoponus has been identified as the founder in dynamics of the theory of impetus, an inner force impressed from without, which, in its later recurrence, has been hailed as a scientific revolution. His commentary is translated here without the previously translated excursus, the <i>Corollary</i>
<p>Philoponus has been identified as the founder in dynamics of the theory of impetus, an inner force impressed from without, which, in its later recurrence, has been hailed as a scientific revolution. His commentary is translated here without the previously translated excursus, the <i>Corollary</i>
<p>In the chapters discussed in this section of Philoponus' <i>Physics</i> commentary, Aristotle explores a range of questions about the basic structure of reality, the nature of prime matter, the principles of change, the relation between form and matter, and the issue of whether things can come in
Philoponus' commentary on the last part of Aristotle's Physics Book 4 does not offer major alternatives to Aristotle's science, as did his commentary on the earlier parts, concerning place, vacuum and motion in a vacuum. Aristotle's subject here is time, and his treatment of it had led to controvers
Philoponusβ commentary on the last part of Aristotleβs Physics Book 4 does not offer major alternatives to Aristotleβs science, as did his commentary on the earlier parts, concerning place, vacuum and motion in a vacuum. Aristotleβs subject here is time, and his treatment of it had led to controvers