๐”– Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

๐Ÿ“

Philoponus on Aristotle physics 1.4-9

โœ Scribed by Aristotle.; Osborne, Catherine; Philoponus, John


Publisher
Bloomsbury Academic;Bristol Classical Press;Duckworth
Year
2009
Tongue
English
Leaves
192
Series
Ancient commentators on Aristotle
Category
Library

โฌ‡  Acquire This Volume

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


In the chapters discussed in this section of Philoponus' Physics commentary, Aristotle explores a range of questions about the basic structure of reality, the nature of prime matter, the principles of change, the relation between form and matter, and the issue of whether things can come into being out of nothing, and if so, in what sense that is true. Philoponus' commentaries do not merely report and explain Aristotle and the other thinkers whom Aristotle is discussing. They are also the philosophical work of an independent thinker in the Neoplatonic tradition. Philoponus has his own, occasionally idiosyncratic, views on a number of important issues, and he sometimes disagrees with other teachers whose views he has encountered perhaps in written texts, and sometimes in oral delivery. A number of distinctive passages of philosophical importance occur in this part of Book 1, in which we see Philoponus at work on issues in physics and cosmology, as well as logic and metaphysics.

โœฆ Subjects


Aristotle. -- Physics. Physics -- Philosophy. SCIENCE -- Energy. SCIENCE -- Mechanics -- General. SCIENCE -- Physics -- General. Physics (Aristotle) Aristotle.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Philoponus: On Aristotle Physics 4.6-9
โœ Huby, Pamela(Translation) ๐Ÿ“‚ Library ๐Ÿ“… 2013 ๐Ÿ› Bristol Classical Press ๐ŸŒ English

Philoponus has been identified as the founder in dynamics of the theory of impetus, an inner force impressed from without, which, in its later recurrence, has been hailed as a scientific revolution. His commentary is translated here without the previously translated excursus, the<i>Corollary</i><i>o

Philoponus: On Aristotle Physics 4.6-9
โœ Pamela Huby ๐Ÿ“‚ Library ๐Ÿ“… 2012 ๐Ÿ› Bloomsbury Academic ๐ŸŒ English

Philoponus has been identified as the founder in dynamics of the theory of impetus, an inner force impressed from without, which, in its later recurrence, has been hailed as a scientific revolution. His commentary is translated here without the previously translated excursus, the Corollary on Void,

Philoponus : on Aristotle physics 4.6-9
โœ Huby, Pamela ๐Ÿ“‚ Library ๐Ÿ“… 2012 ๐Ÿ› Bristol Classical Press;Bloomsbury Academic ๐ŸŒ English

<p>Philoponus has been identified as the founder in dynamics of the theory of impetus, an inner force impressed from without, which, in its later recurrence, has been hailed as a scientific revolution. His commentary is translated here without the previously translated excursus, the <i>Corollary</i>

Philoponus : on Aristotle physics 4.6-9
โœ Philoponus & Pamela Huby ๐Ÿ“‚ Library ๐Ÿ“… 2012 ๐Ÿ› Bristol Classical Press;Bloomsbury Academic ๐ŸŒ English

<p>Philoponus has been identified as the founder in dynamics of the theory of impetus, an inner force impressed from without, which, in its later recurrence, has been hailed as a scientific revolution. His commentary is translated here without the previously translated excursus, the <i>Corollary</i>

Philoponus: On Aristotle Physics 4.1-5
โœ Keimpe Algra; Johannes van Ophuijsen ๐Ÿ“‚ Library ๐Ÿ“… 2012 ๐Ÿ› Bristol Classical Press ๐ŸŒ English

Aristotle's account of place, in which he defined a thing's place as the inner surface of its nearest immobile container, was supported by the Latin Middle Ages, even 1600 years after his death, though it had not convinced many ancient Greek philosophers. The sixth century commentator Philoponus too

Philoponus: On Aristotle Physics 4.1-5
โœ John Philoponus, Johannes van Ophuijsen, Keimpe Algra ๐Ÿ“‚ Library ๐Ÿ“… 2012 ๐Ÿ› Bloomsbury Academic;Bristol Classical Press ๐ŸŒ English

<p>Aristotle's account of place, in which he defined a thing's place as the inner surface of its nearest immobile container, was supported by the Latin Middle Ages, even 1600 years after his death, though it had not convinced many ancient Greek philosophers. The sixth century commentator Philoponus