𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Pet scanning in head and neck oncology: A review

✍ Scribed by W. Frederick McGuirt; Kathryn Greven; Dan Williams III; John W. Keyes Jr; Nat Watson; James O. Cappellari; Kim R. Geisinger


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
1998
Tongue
English
Weight
641 KB
Volume
20
Category
Article
ISSN
1043-3074

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Background. The objective of this study was to review and describe the usage of fluorine-labeled deoxyglucose (FDG) and positron emission tomography (PET) in the diagnosis and management of head and neck cancer.

Methods. Several prospective series,-including 159 newly diagnosed and previously untreated and 23 previously irradiated head and neck squamous cell carcinoma patients initially seen at the Wake Forest University Medical Center and evaluated by clinical examination, conventional computed tomography/ magnetic resonance imaging (CT/MRI) scans, PET scans, and histopathologic studies,-were reviewed and the findings summarized for comparison of the correct differentiation of primary and metastatic cancers and for postirradiation tumor clearance in a subsegment of those cases.

Results. Positron emission tomography scanning using a fluorine-labeled deoxyglucose (FDG) radiotracer proved as reliable as conventional scanning for primary and metastatic tumor identification. Compared with clinical examination, PET was bet-ter for identification of nodal metastatic tumors but poorer for small primary tumors. For previously irradiated patients treated at least 4 months before the test, PET scanning was clearly superior to clinical examination and conventional imaging in differentiating tumor recurrence from soft-tissue irradiation effects.

Conclusions. Fluorine-labeled deoxyglucose-PET scanning is comparable to conventional imaging of head and neck cancers in detecting primary and metastatic carcinoma. Lack of anatomic detail remains its major drawback. Currently, its greatest role is in the evaluation of the postradiotherapy patient.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Advances in head and neck oncology
✍ Maisie Shindo πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1999 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 42 KB πŸ‘ 2 views
Training in head and neck surgery and on
✍ Ashok R. Shaha πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2008 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 87 KB

## Abstract Management of head and neck cancer truly represents the need for a multimodality approach. This manuscript discusses the history of head and neck surgery, head and neck fellowships and the current trends in the practice of head and neck surgery and oncology. Increasing emphasis is place

Effects of upstaging from PET scan on su
✍ Stephanie Misono; Tessa Rue; Joseph Rajendran; Greg E. Davis πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2010 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 73 KB πŸ‘ 2 views

## Abstract ## Background. Stage migration occurs when new diagnostic modalities provide additional information, leading to reclassification of disease stage. Our objective was to examine whether stage migration occurs with inclusion of positron emission tomography (PET) scans in staging head and

State of head and neck surgical oncology
✍ Kevin M. Higgins; Jenny R. Wang πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2008 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 103 KB

## Abstract Surgical literature has been criticized for the lack of high‐quality research. The present review examines methodological quality of literature published in head and neck surgical oncology. We focus on landmark studies published on topics of best practice controversy, namely (1) the rol

Complementary and alternative medicine u
✍ Tarren Vyas; Robert D. Hart; Jonathan R. Trites; Timothy J. Philips; Kathleen E. πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2009 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 307 KB πŸ‘ 2 views

## Abstract ## Background The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) use among patients presenting to a head and neck oncology clinic prior to a diagnosis. ## Methods The study was conducted by administering questionnaires to 102 patient