✦ LIBER ✦

Pedagogy and practice: Service-learning and students' moral development

✍ Scribed by Charles R. Strain

Publisher: John Wiley and Sons
Year: 2005
Tongue: English
Weight: 69 KB
Volume: 2005
Category: Article
ISSN: 0271-0633
DOI: 10.1002/tl.204

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis

Abstract

Service‐learning courses can be powerful instruments for cognitive, affective, and moral transformation. This chapter examines the strengths and weaknesses of service‐learning as an agent for cognitive, moral, and interpersonal development and its ability to promote civic or social engagement.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Engaging pedagogy: One student's lesson

Engaging pedagogy: One student's lesson in teaching and learning

✍ Riera, JosÃ©-Luis 📂 Article 📅 2010 🏛 John Wiley and Sons ⚖ 110 KB 👁 2 views

Learning to learn: Research and developm

Learning to learn: Research and development in student learning

✍ Dai Hounsell 📂 Article 📅 1979 🏛 Springer 🌐 English ⚖ 981 KB

Challenges in Supporting Student Learnin

Challenges in Supporting Student Learning and Success Through Student Services

✍ Terry E. Williams 📂 Article 📅 2002 🏛 John Wiley and Sons ⚖ 52 KB

## Abstract Student service units in community colleges are challenged by the increasing diversity of the student population, the call for a renewed focus on student learning and success, and the need to demonstrate more clearly the value‐added dimensions of their work.

Revisions in the theory and practice of

Revisions in the theory and practice of moral development

✍ Lawrence Kohlberg 📂 Article 📅 1978 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 289 KB 👁 3 views

School psychology and college learning d

School psychology and college learning disabled students: Traning and service possibilities

✍ Edward M. Levinson 📂 Article 📅 1986 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 548 KB

Assessing learning and development among

Assessing learning and development among diverse college students

✍ Nicholas A. Bowman 📂 Article 📅 2010 🏛 John Wiley and Sons ⚖ 101 KB

## Abstract This chapter examines the validity of college student self‐reported gains by exploring the correspondence between self‐reported gains and longitudinally assessed gains for diverse groups of students.