## Abstract The perfect‐electric‐conductor (PEC) condition implementation for the alternating‐direction‐implicit finite‐difference time‐domain (ADI‐FDTD) method is discussed in this article. By comparing different implementation strategies, it shows that the most accurate implementation method is t
Parallel implementation of the ADI-FDTD method
✍ Scribed by T. Stefański; T. D. Drysdale
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2009
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 284 KB
- Volume
- 51
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0895-2477
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Abstract
We present a parallel implementation of the three‐dimensional alternating direction implicit finite‐difference time‐domain (ADI‐FDTD) method in Cartesian coordinates using the message passing interface (MPI) library. Parallel implementations not only speed up computations but also increase the maximum solvable problem size. The application of the ADI scheme results in freeing the time‐step size from the Courant‐Friedrichs‐Lewy stability constraint. We demonstrate a speedup of the ADI‐FDTD method through parallelization, even though the communication overhead between the processors is proportional to the volume of the domain, rather than just the surface area of the subdomains as for standard parallel FDTD. We benchmarked our code on an IBM p690 symmetric multiprocessor and also a distributed memory computer cluster with a high‐bandwidth Infiniband interconnect. In both cases, satisfactory scalability and efficiency was demonstrated for simulation domains comprising up to 8 billion mesh cells. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Microwave Opt Technol Lett 51: 1298–1304, 2009; Published online in Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley.com). DOI 10.1002/mop.24310
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Abstract Bilinear approximation is employed to implement the perfectly matched layer (PML) absorbing boundary condition in the alternating direction implicit (ADI) finite‐difference time‐domain (FDTD) method. Numerical examples show that this implementation is effective and unconditionally stabl
## Abstract In this article two special considerations or notes on the implementation of the alternating direction implicit finite‐difference–time‐domain (ADI‐FDTD) method are discussed. In particular, the two notes are (a) the mathematical algorithm used to solve the tridiagonal matrix equation, a
## Abstract Current implementations of the Mur 1st‐order absorbing boundary condition (Mur1) in the alternating‐direction implicit finite‐difference time‐domain (ADI‐FDTD) method treat the intermediate (half‐step) variables as electromagnetic field quantities that are an approximate solution to Max
## Abstract In this paper, a higher‐order alternative‐direction‐implicit (ADI) finite‐difference time‐domain (FDTD) method is presented. The dispersion analysis is performed and the results are compared with those derived from the regular ADI‐FDTD method. Based on the dispersion analysis, a guideli