## Abstract A 2D higher‐order alternating‐direction‐implicit (ADI) finite‐difference time‐domain method based on a compact scheme is presented in this paper. This compact ADI method improves the efficiency of computation by reducing the bandwidth of the matrix to be inversed from seven to five for
Development of a higher-order ADI-FDTD method
✍ Scribed by Zhu Wang; Ji Chen; Yinchao Chen
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2003
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 162 KB
- Volume
- 37
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0895-2477
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Abstract
In this paper, a higher‐order alternative‐direction‐implicit (ADI) finite‐difference time‐domain (FDTD) method is presented. The dispersion analysis is performed and the results are compared with those derived from the regular ADI‐FDTD method. Based on the dispersion analysis, a guideline for choosing an appropriate time step in the ADI‐FDTD implementation is also developed. Both numerical simulation and dispersion analysis demonstrate the advantage of this higher order ADI‐FDTD method for improving accuracy. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Microwave Opt Technol Lett 37: 8–12, 2003; Published online in Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley.com). DOI 10.1002/mop.10808
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Abstract A two‐step FDTD method as a compromise of conditional stability and reduced splitting error is formulated and its numerical stability is investigated. It is the perturbed form to the ADI‐FDTD method by the addition of second order cross derivative term. It is validated from the comparis
## Abstract We present a parallel implementation of the three‐dimensional alternating direction implicit finite‐difference time‐domain (ADI‐FDTD) method in Cartesian coordinates using the message passing interface (MPI) library. Parallel implementations not only speed up computations but also incre
## Abstract Current implementations of the Mur 1st‐order absorbing boundary condition (Mur1) in the alternating‐direction implicit finite‐difference time‐domain (ADI‐FDTD) method treat the intermediate (half‐step) variables as electromagnetic field quantities that are an approximate solution to Max