Hepatitis C virus (HCV) recurs in nearly all patients after liver transplantation. This recurrence is associated with progressive fibrosis and graft loss. It remains unclear whether the natural course of HCV recurrence is altered in patients who undergo living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). We
Outcomes in hepatitis C virus–infected recipients of living donor vs. deceased donor liver transplantation
✍ Scribed by Norah A. Terrault; Mitchell L. Shiffman; Anna S.F. Lok; Sammy Saab; Lan Tong; Robert S. Brown Jr.; Gregory T. Everson; K. Rajender Reddy; Jeffrey H. Fair; Laura M. Kulik; Timothy L. Pruett; Leonard B. Seeff
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2006
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 166 KB
- Volume
- 13
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 1527-6465
- DOI
- 10.1002/lt.20995
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
In this retrospective study of hepatitis C virus (HCV)-infected transplant recipients in the 9-center Adult to Adult Living Donor Liver Transplantation Cohort Study, graft and patient survival and the development of advanced fibrosis were compared among 181 living donor liver transplant (LDLT) recipients and 94 deceased donor liver transplant (DDLT) recipients. Overall 3-year graft and patient survival were 68% and 74% in LDLT, and 80% and 82% in DDLT, respectively. Graft survival, but not patient survival, was significantly lower for LDLT compared to DDLT (P ϭ 0.04 and P ϭ 0.20, respectively). Further analyses demonstrated lower graft and patient survival among the first 20 LDLT cases at each center (LDLT 20) compared to later cases (LDLT Ͼ 20; P ϭ 0.002 and P ϭ 0.002, respectively) and DDLT recipients (P Ͻ 0.001 and P ϭ 0.008, respectively). Graft and patient survival in LDLT Ͼ20 and DDLT were not significantly different (P ϭ 0.66 and P ϭ 0.74, respectively). Overall, 3-year graft survival for DDLT, LDLT Ͼ20, and LDLT 20 were 80%, 79% and 55%, with similar results conditional on survival to 90 days (84%, 87% and 68%, respectively). Predictors of graft loss beyond 90 days included LDLT 20 vs. DDLT (hazard ratio [HR] ϭ 2.1, P ϭ 0.04), pretransplant hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) (HR ϭ 2.21, P ϭ 0.03) and model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) at transplantation (HR ϭ 1.24, P ϭ 0.04). In conclusion, 3-year graft and patient survival in HCV-infected recipients of DDLT and LDLT Ͼ20 were not significantly different. Important predictors of graft loss in HCV-infected patients were limited LDLT experience, pretransplant HCC, and higher MELD at transplantation.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
The question of possible earlier and more aggressive recurrence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection after living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) compared to deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT) remains unanswered. To address this issue we retrospectively reviewed virological, histological
This study tested the hypothesis that hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA and core antigen levels rise more rapidly after liver transplantation (LT) in recipients of grafts from living donors (LD) versus deceased donors (DD). Eleven consecutive LD and 15 DD recipients were followed prospectively. Before LT,
We have investigated the impact of the donor risk index (DRI) on the outcome of hepatitis C virus (HCV)-infected patients undergoing liver transplantation (LTx). Retrospective analysis was performed from the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network database (January 1, 2000 to June, 2006). The
Hepatitis C recurs universally after liver transplantation (LT). Whether its progression differs after live donor liver transplantation (LDLT) and deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT) is still debated. We retrospectively analyzed 201 consecutive LTs performed at our institution for hepatitis