𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Optimal Robust Two-Stage Designs for Genome-Wide Association Studies

✍ Scribed by Thuy Trang Nguyen; Roman Pahl; Helmut Schäfer

Book ID
111111521
Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2009
Tongue
English
Weight
439 KB
Volume
73
Category
Article
ISSN
0003-4800

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Optimal designs for two-stage genome-wid
Optimal designs for two-stage genome-wide association studies
✍ Andrew D. Skol; Laura J. Scott; Gonçalo R. Abecasis; Michael Boehnke 📂 Article 📅 2007 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 316 KB 👁 2 views

## Abstract Genome‐wide association (GWA) studies require genotyping hundreds of thousands of markers on thousands of subjects, and are expensive at current genotyping costs. To conserve resources, many GWA studies are adopting a staged design in which a proportion of the available samples are geno

Optimal two-stage genotyping designs for
Optimal two-stage genotyping designs for genome-wide association scans
✍ Hansong Wang; Duncan C. Thomas; Itsik Pe'er; Daniel O. Stram 📂 Article 📅 2006 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 182 KB 👁 2 views

## Abstract The much‐anticipated fixed‐array, genome‐wide SNP genotyping technologies make large‐scale genome‐wide association scans now possible for large numbers of subjects. In this paper we reconsider the problem (Satagopan and Elston [2003] Genet Epidemiol 25:149–157) of optimizing a two‐stage

Including sampling and phenotyping costs
Including sampling and phenotyping costs into the optimization of two stage designs for genome wide association studies
✍ Hans-Helge Müller; Roman Pahl; Helmut Schäfer 📂 Article 📅 2007 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 239 KB 👁 2 views

## Abstract We propose optimized two‐stage designs for genome‐wide case‐control association studies, using a hypothesis testing paradigm. To save genotyping costs, the complete marker set is genotyped in a sub‐sample only (stage I). On stage II, the most promising markers are then genotyped in the