๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

On the sign convention for raman optical activity

โœ Scribed by L.D. Barron; J.F. Torrance

Publisher
Elsevier Science
Year
1983
Tongue
English
Weight
193 KB
Volume
102
Category
Article
ISSN
0009-2614

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis

It is suggested that the chirality number of Hug and Surbeck is unsatisfactory, mainly because it does not accord with the convention for positive circular polarization if the principle of reciprocity is invoked. A reversion to the original deftition of the circular intensity difference is proposed.

๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES

Comment on a sum rule for vibrational ra
Comment on a sum rule for vibrational raman optical activity
โœ P.L. Polavarapu ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1986 ๐Ÿ› Elsevier Science ๐ŸŒ English โš– 203 KB

The expressions for the sum of vibrational Raman optical activity (ROA) intensities indtcate that the ROA intensity sum for chiral molecules is non-zero for those with an anisotropic electric dipole polarizability. The non-zero sum depends upon the electric dipole, magnetic dipole and electric quad

A sum rule for vibrational Raman optical
A sum rule for vibrational Raman optical activity
โœ B. Cuony; W. Hug ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1981 ๐Ÿ› Elsevier Science ๐ŸŒ English โš– 315 KB

A sum rule 15 shown to exfit 111 vibrational Raman optical activrty m non-absorbmg regrons for lsotopicalIy chiral molecules d the point group of the achiral decttun dMri%u~on u 0ihe.r tixari Cnh and Ct. and d ihe Isotope-subsMuted &es are located m refleaon p'kxnes or related p-e by Improper rotati