On the measurement of preferences in the analytic hierarchy process
✍ Scribed by Ahti A. Salo; Raimo P. Hämäläinen
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 1997
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 365 KB
- Volume
- 6
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 1057-9214
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
In this paper we apply multiattribute value theory as a framework for examining the use of pairwise comparisons in the analytic hierarchy process (AHP). On one hand our analysis indicates that pairwise comparisons should be understood in terms of preference differences between pairs of alternatives. On the other hand it points out undesirable effects caused by the upper bound and the discretization of any given ratio scale. Both these observations apply equally well to the SMART procedure which also uses estimates of weight ratios. Furthermore, we demonstrate that the AHP can be modified so as to produce results similar to those of multiattribute value measurement; we also propose new balanced scales to improve the sensitivity of the AHP ratio scales. Finally we show that the so-called supermatrix technique does not eliminate the rank reversal phenomenon which can be attributed to the normalizations in the AHP.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
used to derive a partial preference ordering. For two recent methods see Salo and HaÈ maÈ laÈ inen (1992, 1995) and for an overview see Weber (1987). From empirical research we know that subjects are prone to biases. In addition, as pointed out by the authors, verbal expressions used in the AHP migh
This study compares alternative preference elicitation methods that are currently available in software implementations of the analytic hierarchy process. For the simple problem used in this study, the elicitation methods may be sorted from least to most accurate as follows: (1) direct estimation, (
This study reports the results of a field experiment comparing the predictive validity of two approaches to multicriteria assessments: the absolute measurement mode of AHP and the absolute measurement mode of linking pin AHP. The questioning procedures of the two differ only in that the former emplo