In this paper we apply multiattribute value theory as a framework for examining the use of pairwise comparisons in the analytic hierarchy process (AHP). On one hand our analysis indicates that pairwise comparisons should be understood in terms of preference differences between pairs of alternatives.
Measurement scales and scale independence in the analytic hierarchy process
โ Scribed by Pekka Leskinen
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2000
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 115 KB
- Volume
- 9
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 1057-9214
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
๐ SIMILAR VOLUMES
This study compares alternative preference elicitation methods that are currently available in software implementations of the analytic hierarchy process. For the simple problem used in this study, the elicitation methods may be sorted from least to most accurate as follows: (1) direct estimation, (
This study reports the results of a field experiment comparing the predictive validity of two approaches to multicriteria assessments: the absolute measurement mode of AHP and the absolute measurement mode of linking pin AHP. The questioning procedures of the two differ only in that the former emplo
used to derive a partial preference ordering. For two recent methods see Salo and Haร maร laร inen (1992, 1995) and for an overview see Weber (1987). From empirical research we know that subjects are prone to biases. In addition, as pointed out by the authors, verbal expressions used in the AHP migh